- Joined
- Mar 1, 2010
- Messages
- 10,844
Some guys who lament about how 'they don't build them like they used to' when looking at equipment with thinner metal sections, metal replaced by composites, skeletonization where parts used to be solid, using industrial adhesives instead of mechanical fasteners, weight savings across the board for a minor or non-existent reduction in durability against the most extreme circumstance. They're harkening back to a day of more solid construction with less engineering and care for efficient material application. Give some of them a modern tactical folder with a thousand pound lock, and they'll tell you how back in the day you didn't need so much metal and strength in your cutting tools. I dunno.
I trust knife locks as much as I trust ratchet handle mechanisms, jack stands, parking brakes, deadbolts, elevators, nuts, bolts, screws, and anything else where my life and safety relies on two separate pieces of metal contacting across a relatively small bearing surface. I couldn't leave my house if I treated everything that locks like it was a slipjoint. My knives just aren't built that poorly, I guess.
What is the GB an example of? The guy said it would be operator error if he cut himself, its like you're saying the GB is an example of a liner lock that will cut you without it being your fault.
I mentioned the GB as an example of a liner lock that's a bit harder than others to inadvertently disengage.