- Joined
- Feb 28, 2007
- Messages
- 9,786
Sitting back this labor day weekend, the start of another year (I'm a prof so school year is my 'fiscal year') I can't help but remark on the paradigm shift in WS&S this past year.
It is a fad, I know, or a cycle. I've only been on these forums for a year and a half now and I can't help but notice how broadley we moved from thick to thin knives as a consensus group this summer compared to the previous one.
I recall 9+ page threads of 'How are you guys breaking your mora's' from last summer with all the enticing defenses coming from the thick crowd. Back then it seemed that 3/16" was thin and 1/4" was "it". Jerry Busse was pumping out knives that were almost 0.3" thick - now it seems his Skinny Ash (3/16") and slim active duty models are getting lots of attention.
I see a bunch of new knifemakers promoting the merits of 1/8" in long knives and have come to my own realization of the utility of this thickness as the new 'all-rounder'. Koyote comes to mind here as someone foraging new territories in the long 1/8" knife. Fiddleback, has been here a longer time than me but has always to my knowledge been a staunch promoter of thin and laser sharp.
We have many more defenders of thin and moderate length than we did last year. Bearthedog and JeffH are highly active members who seem to actively promote this size. We see a shift to more and more posts contrasting machete's as choppers compared to Kukris and the venerable RD-9/dogfathers. Maybe its because we can't get RD-9's so easily anymore (waiting for Ontario to step up its production..). I don't see a battle mistress post hear every week like I used to.
Even our co-moderators are a bit biased now. K Estela definately seems to like thin. Brian likes sharp and convex.
Anyhow - this is just my Andy Rooney'ish commentary. I'm not trying to start a thin vs thick war, but rather just pointing out the how much we've changed in one year's time. I'm sure it will be different again next year.
What hasn't change - we all still love tool steels....
It is a fad, I know, or a cycle. I've only been on these forums for a year and a half now and I can't help but notice how broadley we moved from thick to thin knives as a consensus group this summer compared to the previous one.
I recall 9+ page threads of 'How are you guys breaking your mora's' from last summer with all the enticing defenses coming from the thick crowd. Back then it seemed that 3/16" was thin and 1/4" was "it". Jerry Busse was pumping out knives that were almost 0.3" thick - now it seems his Skinny Ash (3/16") and slim active duty models are getting lots of attention.
I see a bunch of new knifemakers promoting the merits of 1/8" in long knives and have come to my own realization of the utility of this thickness as the new 'all-rounder'. Koyote comes to mind here as someone foraging new territories in the long 1/8" knife. Fiddleback, has been here a longer time than me but has always to my knowledge been a staunch promoter of thin and laser sharp.
We have many more defenders of thin and moderate length than we did last year. Bearthedog and JeffH are highly active members who seem to actively promote this size. We see a shift to more and more posts contrasting machete's as choppers compared to Kukris and the venerable RD-9/dogfathers. Maybe its because we can't get RD-9's so easily anymore (waiting for Ontario to step up its production..). I don't see a battle mistress post hear every week like I used to.
Even our co-moderators are a bit biased now. K Estela definately seems to like thin. Brian likes sharp and convex.
Anyhow - this is just my Andy Rooney'ish commentary. I'm not trying to start a thin vs thick war, but rather just pointing out the how much we've changed in one year's time. I'm sure it will be different again next year.
What hasn't change - we all still love tool steels....