Easy Analysis!

waynorth

Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
Joined
Nov 19, 2005
Messages
33,211
I thought it might help some of our newer members, especially those inclined to buy old knives on auction sites, to share a discussion about a knife one of my friends on here asked me about.
He asked me to look at this Easy Open Jack, and tell him if I could, if it was original. Here are pictures;
Easy1.jpg

Easy2.jpg

Easy3.jpg

Easy4.jpg

Easy5.jpg

Easy6.jpg

I have a reproduction Schrade Cut Co. catalog that covers 1926 to 1936, and another that covers 1940. A limited sample, for sure.
All EO Teardrop Jacks in the catalog, not just the stainless ones, have two blades, the secondary being a pen blade. I've never seen a single bladed EO Teardrop Schrade of this size, 3 5/8". There is no stainless knife with Ebony handles listed in either catalog! Ebony was cheaper material, and they were trying to get people interested in stainless. It failed back then (1920s) and Schrade dropped stainless for a while I believe.
At first glance, it appears all the parts are Schrade, and I still believe that is true. But it is a very hard knife to judge, using pictures!!
So I asked my friend to send it to me.
It's the subtle details that gave it away. Most of those details are slight; a few thousandths of an inch!!
The backspring rides high when the knife is closed and at halfstop. When a cutler in a factory hafted a knife, the backspring was always sanded flush. You can barely see the backspring in the third picture down.
The backspring rides low when the knife is open. The blade sits higher than the spring when it is open, and is slightly thinner than the spring.
The Main blade pivot rivet has flaws in the "head"; missing chips.
As a beginner, I might have missed ALL these subtle signs. Now that I've gawked at thousands of Schrades, I can tell with a fair amount of certainty that this knife is put together from parts.
One of the best questions you can ask yourself, when you are looking at a vintage knife is, "Would a good cutlery let this knife out the door?"!
The pen blade and accompanying spring were removed, as was the main blade, and a Stainless blade was swapped into the knife.
The knife is quite usable, but does not represent a legit sample of Schrade's production.
I am sorry I can't provide you with larger pictures, and only hope my descriptions succeed in communicating the details.
Respectfully submitted,
Charlie
 
Last edited:
Thanks for taking the effort to put this together!
 
Thanks Charlie, very educational. As a new would be collector of older slipjoints I would also be interested in seeing more posts of this nature.

thanks
Dan
 
Thanks for sharing that. Are all most Schrade Waldens flush in all positions? Forgive me if that's a dumb question. I know very little about vintage knives.
 
Thanks Charlie. all these signs are rather subtle, especially "The Main blade pivot rivet has flaws in the "head"; missing chips." I can't see it in the pics.
I'd say whomever did the re-work was quite skilled. makes me wonder how many of the vintage knives i look at on ebay are actually re-works, unbeknownst even to the seller. now i'd say much higher percentage than i previously thought.
I think many, perhaps most, collectors would not have ID'd this as a re-work.
we here are fortunate to have you as our "Forensic Knifeologist".
Thanks for showing this.
roland
 
Thanks for the very informative analysis. It's posts like this, and ones in BRL's subforum that make me glad I can only afford newer knives! There seems to be a lot of fakery in the vintage knife world.

The thing I noticed was that the blade seems to sit above the liners in the closed position. Would Schrade allow the knife to leave the factory without filing down the kick a little to make it close further? It appears to me that the blade is full, so it hasn't been sharpened to the point of peeking.
 
Wow, thank you for the education. I would have been fooled with that one. It's all in the details. I will pay more attention when I look at old knives. Thanks again for posting this information.
 
Even if its made from parts, its quite nicely put together and still is quite nice user. I would have never been able to tell if it was made from parts or real pattern. I wouldn't mind carry and use that.
 
Thank you Charlie. Much appreciated. I learned a heck of a lot from this.
g
 
Quote: "It appears to me that the blade is full, so it hasn't been sharpened to the point of peeking."
The swage goes very nearly to the tip of the blade which i think indicates blade loss, hence the exposed tip.
However, i'll be interested to see what Charlie says 'bout this.
roland
 
Quote: "It appears to me that the blade is full, so it hasn't been sharpened to the point of peeking."
The swage goes very nearly to the tip of the blade which i think indicates blade loss, hence the exposed tip.
However, i'll be interested to see what Charlie says 'bout this.
roland

Oh yeah- you're probably right. Yet another reason I should probably stay away from vintage knives!
 
Great thread Charlie!!!

Check out the pivot rivet though, it appears that those are just dents in the bolster. I'm pretty certain the rivets are aligned closer to the handles on those teardrops. Judging by the location of that spring end, the location of those dents would put the rivet too close to the edge of the tang. Pretty decent repair if that's what it was meant to be, but you're sure right about it not being a production model.

Eric
 
My first thoughts on looking at the pics (prior to reading the text) were:

No knife company in the old days ever made a single blade teardrop EO jack...two blades, yes, single blades, no.

Schrade made a number of stainless pocket knives circa 1920's to 1930's in bone and celluloid but none in ebony and stainless.

Then looking at the pic, the main backspring pin is not tarnished like the handle pins indicating that it may be of newer vintage, consistent with a knife that was taken apart and rebuilt.
 
Thank you very much. While I love the information I get from Bernard Levine's forum it is often over my head. Tutorials like this are very helpful.
 
While not really a collector of truly vintage knives, I love reading this type of detailed analysis - even more so when written in terms that my simplistic brain can understand. Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge and insights.
 
While not really a collector of truly vintage knives, I love reading this type of detailed analysis - even more so when written in terms that my simplistic brain can understand. Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge and insights.

You are welcome Dallas - but don't sell yourself short. Anyone can learn this stuff with a little effort. I actually spend a lot of time trying to make my words understandable, otherwise, why do it! Thanks everyone for the feedback!

I think the blade is from the same pattern but in stainless. And it is indeed short, causing it to "peek" (peek out of the handle - cute term:)) It also "peeks" because it doesn't quite fit.

Here's a near mint blade next to the subject knife. The handle pattern is the same, but without the EO notch. A lot of blade has been used up, as you can see.
Easy7.jpg


Eric, the rivet and hole are where those chips are. I tried several times to get the chips on the pivot to show, but couldn't quite manage it. Aging scanner. The pits you see in the main bolster are partly those chips, which are caused from improper peening technique. The hole is damaged and not round, and the edge of the peened cap is ragged.

Steve, I would expect nothing less of your quick analysis!:D

I hope this exercise makes us all better collectors, and educates sellers too.
If we refuse to pay big bucks for knives like this, it keeps things real.
It is a good using knife, and could be even better with a little adjusment, but it's not collectable in the historical sense, IMO.
 
Dang! Maybe I need some glasses after all :eek:, I can't see a whole lot of damage. We are talking about this pin, right? Maybe the scanner's losing the detail:


mraadu.jpg
[/IMG]
 
I agree with Eric, the pin to me looks invisible. It does not look to have been re-pinned, on either end of the bolsters. I have never seen a single blade E.O. like this as has been mentioned, but I have seen people cut their own E.O. notch in an old knife, if you look at this knife that is most likely what was done to it.


CE
 
Back
Top