If you want the exposure of the secondary bevel to remain uniform, you have to adjust the stone's angle of attack as you move along the blade. Or perhaps more correctly, you have to keep it from adjusting itself.
There are several potential variables in play, edge thickness being one of them, as ES says. Based on your description, my guess is that one factor in your situation is that you are increasing the distance from the stone's pivot to its contact point with the blade as you move toward the tip of the knife.
Consider a plan view of the EP and knife. The knife is resting on the EP's platen in its most advanced position (as you would begin sharpening). If you place the stone on the blade so that its parallel with the platen, it will fall just forward of the rear of the cutting edge. In that position, the stone is traveling on its shortest path = steepest vertical angle.
If you continue to sharpen toward the tip of the knife, without moving the knife, the stone has to travel an increasingly greater distance from its pivot point = decreasing vertical angle = increasing exposure of secondary bevel.