The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
And on aesthetics, it is a very personal choice.. I myself would feel a little embarrassed carrying any knife that drew ANY attention, especially something flashy. Maybe i'm just self conscious, don't know.. I think i'd rather wear something looks like a dog might have chewed on it, than some big fixed blade pearl handled number, that draws attention. I would rather not be called "Mr. Fancy pants".
So, sheephorn and "idaho potato" handles are fine with me.
David
First, the idea about "sameness" . Some knifemakers work off of a template- esp. stock removal makers. I'm thinking of Loveless, for instance, the patterns on the wall of his shop for each of his different models. When he wants to make a drop point hunter, or a big bear, or chute, he takes a blank off the wall and uses it as a guide- strictly.
I think Ed's method is quite different, because his knives (blades) are never strict to one shape- it is a "freehand" type idea. Though I've never been in the shop to see, i would be surprised if he uses much to guide him, apart from eyeing it. Which is artistic freedom and license. In general looking at Ed's knives , proportions change constantly. New and old things always in progress, ideas coming into being. This is true evolution.
Compare this to many other knifemakers, i often see the standard shape, repeated over- often changing the artistic qualities..someone mentioned Michael Walker's knives. While innovative and state of the art, his blade shapes (i've seen) stay relatively constant, through constant changing damascus/artistic patterns. why?..
For my taste, If it is only the artistic merits changing, the work lacks progress.
David