- Joined
- Jun 16, 2003
- Messages
- 20,206
MelancholyMutt said:Yes, Thomas, the point IS that Stewart somehow, does NOT have the full right to use the Ek trademark. his knives are thus marked EK, expedition knives and would pass as an Ek knife to the casual observer or novice (why not call them bark river knives).
It's funny that if a white guy in the midwest clones a knife and sells it with a name that is deceptively close to another trademarked name, it's a matter of business, and if someone in China or Japan makes a clone, then they are evil and thieves.
Thomas, not many people want to defend Stewarts position because they are not as stellar and pure as they make themselves out to be and arguing with them is a lost cause. Being an avid Ek collector, I've followed the story since it started way back so I'm not gonna buy any b*llsh*t story...
I gather that you classify Mike Stewart as "evil" and a "thief." I have absolutely no reason in my knowledge or experience to accept your version of the facts vs. Mike's statements. Hopefully, I am not a "lost cause." Maybe if I knew you better. Maybe if I was an "avid Ek collector." Maybe if I had perfect knowkledge of all things. I am but a khukuri collector with slight knowledge of things EK -- and this is a khukuri forum. There might be a more appropriate place than Uncle Bill's forum to indict another manufacturer.
Tom