- Joined
- Feb 7, 2000
- Messages
- 6,685
Guys, I'm 37 years old and I've finally come to a painful realization. Here goes:
I'm never going to be a cowboy or a rancher. I live in a city and work indoors. I might walk my dog a few times a day but I am never punch any doggies. As such, I'm never ever ever ever ever going to castrate anything. Ever. Not with a stockman pocketknife, not with ANYTHING. There's just no scenario in the world that will involve me cutting the genitals off an animal. It ain't going to happen. I also am never going "notch" the ears of livestock. I am never going to use the spey blade on my stockman to do the "vet work" that Steven Dick refers to in the stockman section of his fine book The Working Folding Knife (even in the book, where Dick is lauding the usefulness of the stockman pattern, he just touches on the spey blade in passing ..... somethink like Oh, and if you ever need to do surgery on an animal, you'll be ready.
).
Now, I believe the VAST majority (99%?) of the guys who purchase and tote stockman pocketknives are a lot more like me than they are like the "stock men" for which the knife was designed. So why are stockman lovers still (for the most part) stuck with no option other than to carry a knife with a spey blade, a blade that's such an anachronism!?
Isn't there a better use for that third blade? I mean the main clip blade and the sheepsfoot are GREAT, get used all the time. But is there any stockman owner in the world who doesn't use his spey blade the least?
What's keeping this pattern from evolving? I just fear that those who produce slipjoints face a steep enough uphill climb in this day and age of lightweight, serrated, one-hand wonders, that stubbornly sticking to an outdated pattern is really counterproductive. Hell, I'd even jump at the chance to buy a two-blade "stockman" that only had a clip and a sheepsfoot blade.
Thoughts?
I'm never going to be a cowboy or a rancher. I live in a city and work indoors. I might walk my dog a few times a day but I am never punch any doggies. As such, I'm never ever ever ever ever going to castrate anything. Ever. Not with a stockman pocketknife, not with ANYTHING. There's just no scenario in the world that will involve me cutting the genitals off an animal. It ain't going to happen. I also am never going "notch" the ears of livestock. I am never going to use the spey blade on my stockman to do the "vet work" that Steven Dick refers to in the stockman section of his fine book The Working Folding Knife (even in the book, where Dick is lauding the usefulness of the stockman pattern, he just touches on the spey blade in passing ..... somethink like Oh, and if you ever need to do surgery on an animal, you'll be ready.
Now, I believe the VAST majority (99%?) of the guys who purchase and tote stockman pocketknives are a lot more like me than they are like the "stock men" for which the knife was designed. So why are stockman lovers still (for the most part) stuck with no option other than to carry a knife with a spey blade, a blade that's such an anachronism!?
Isn't there a better use for that third blade? I mean the main clip blade and the sheepsfoot are GREAT, get used all the time. But is there any stockman owner in the world who doesn't use his spey blade the least?
What's keeping this pattern from evolving? I just fear that those who produce slipjoints face a steep enough uphill climb in this day and age of lightweight, serrated, one-hand wonders, that stubbornly sticking to an outdated pattern is really counterproductive. Hell, I'd even jump at the chance to buy a two-blade "stockman" that only had a clip and a sheepsfoot blade.
Thoughts?