Originally posted by longbow
Better steel, better ergonomics I think for an all around general use knife, better lock up although I have never had a problem with the lock up on an EKI.
The BG-42 in my Sebenza is most certainly a much better steel than ATS-34/154-CM, hands down. How much better? Alot better. Are the other two steels the junk that some people claim they are? No.
Better ergonomics on a Sebenza as compared to almost everything EKI makes?
I think we better take a hard look at the word "ergonomics" and define it. The Sebenza, as good as it is and it is my "PC-EDC," does not have the attributes almost every EKI does when it comes to ergonomics.
I've never had a problem with my EKIs liner locks either, but it does not take a rocket scientist to see that the [integral] frame lock is better. No argument there.
I don't like the wave feature at all on my Comander and although very tactical as a knife design the Commander is not what I would consider a good choice for everrday carry. It seems to me be designed for one specific purpose in mind and as someone stated in a previous forums I don't think I will any time soon be removing a sentry.
It is EDC for the most part, still, along with a Sebenza. This thread is rather ironic.
Not good for EDC and don't like the Wave Opener? It all depends on what you are carrying that EDC for.
As for someone remarking that the Commander is better suited for Sentry Removal, I think something or someone is being confused. There were a few Emerson Custom SRTs floating around out there, a fixed blade [small], the Chris Caracci Design-I think only three of them were made and the CQC-9 Eagle. These were designed for that sort of thing.
I think people will say anything they want on a forum.
And, I think I am going to get a SERE 2000 sometime in the future. They are very well made knives.