I know I'm flogging a dead horse, but the funny thing about liner locks is that while the thinness is a factor, it's not much of a factor where people think of it -- at the thickness of the liner.
The biggest issue is that the tang/lockbar mating face surface gets worn down quickly, and that it can slip with miniscule changes in the geometry.
Slippage of the lock is a more critical issue than thickness -- ask Greg Lighfoot, Brian Tighe, Allen Elishewitz, Ernie Emerson... the list goes on of custom makers of hard-use knives that use 0.050" liners.
It doesn't look as nice, certainly... but when it holds, it HOLDS. It's just when it slips, it's scary.
I'd love to see Spyderco license out use of the Compression Lock. That's a situation where the thin liner isn't as much of a factor.
-j
The biggest issue is that the tang/lockbar mating face surface gets worn down quickly, and that it can slip with miniscule changes in the geometry.
Slippage of the lock is a more critical issue than thickness -- ask Greg Lighfoot, Brian Tighe, Allen Elishewitz, Ernie Emerson... the list goes on of custom makers of hard-use knives that use 0.050" liners.
It doesn't look as nice, certainly... but when it holds, it HOLDS. It's just when it slips, it's scary.
I'd love to see Spyderco license out use of the Compression Lock. That's a situation where the thin liner isn't as much of a factor.
-j