mikeymoto
Lifetime Platinum Membership
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2004
- Messages
- 3,312
I joined the crowd. The BWM is a lean machine but those clothes were just too much for her. Here are some pics stripped, edge convexed, handles rubbed with mineral oil, and tube fasteners replaced with 8-32 screws and standoffs I got a while back from McMaster Carr.
Removed the rivets carefully, stripped with Jasco paint remover, then used a Scotch Brite wheel to clean it up.
I did the convexing carefully with a 1x40 belt sander, then removed the burr and addressed the edge using a Fine DMT stone, black arkansas stone, then stropped. I like using Murray Carter's "3 finger" sharpness test, and this edge is keen enough for me.
I would call the grind on the SAR8 a zero edge (full convex from spine to edge). On the BWM there's a convex primary grind and now a convex secondary. Note the difference in edge thickness in this shot:
Edit: Even with the screws and standoffs in the handle, the balance is still forward — right around the "E" on the logo.
Removed the rivets carefully, stripped with Jasco paint remover, then used a Scotch Brite wheel to clean it up.
I did the convexing carefully with a 1x40 belt sander, then removed the burr and addressed the edge using a Fine DMT stone, black arkansas stone, then stropped. I like using Murray Carter's "3 finger" sharpness test, and this edge is keen enough for me.
I would call the grind on the SAR8 a zero edge (full convex from spine to edge). On the BWM there's a convex primary grind and now a convex secondary. Note the difference in edge thickness in this shot:
Edit: Even with the screws and standoffs in the handle, the balance is still forward — right around the "E" on the logo.