Cliff Stamp
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 5, 1998
- Messages
- 17,562
This is a big folder even in comparison to big folders :
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_military_manix.jpg
It weighs 200 grams with a 1/4" thick sabre ground blade from 58 HRC, stainless steel of a non-specific composition. The handle is 1.5 cm thick and 3.0 cm wide. Very boxy, similar to the G10 grips Strider runs. I would prefer this one slightly due to the index finger cutout, but it is still one of the least ergonomic grips every used. Very boxy with lots of high pressure points. It is also fairly slick and due to the angle of the integral guard, ramping over it is not difficult even in a clean grip.
Cutting ability is low due to the low sabre grind and fairly heavy edge profile. This one has been slighty adjusted from NIB specs, the edge is about 0.035" thick, and a few passes on the 20 on the Sharpmaker rods won't cleanly cut the bevel but hit most of it. Measurement shows it to be 20 +/- 1 degrees, so it is likely just slightly over. The bevel could be radically thinned, the dual thumbstuds would have to be removed, but this isn't planned as it is intended for heavier utility work. I have lots of fine cutting knives already.
However I did some light work with it anyway just to benchmark its performance. In the kitchen it could readily cut light foods which just need a sharp blade like green onions :
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_onions.jpg
and the thick profile was useful in hacking parts of frozen ground beef apart :
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_beef.jpg
However cutting thicker vegetables was problematic, onions could only be crudely chunked :
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_onion_chunks.jpg
Attempting to dice up some carrots, while the Japanese Utility knife tok ~3 lbs, the Fulcrum just cracked off pieces with about 13 lbs. Similar in cutting up a block of cheese, similar force was required :
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_cheese.jpg
Moving on to more utility work, the Fulcrum needed 50 +/- 2 lbs to make a push cut on 3/8" hemp, and its wood cutting ability is also many to one behind something like the Paramiliary. It also binds heavily in thick cardboard, and is near impossible to use to cut thick foam insulation.
For wood work, it has decent heft for chopping, but the very large cross section makes it tend to knock light brush around rather than cut it. It also has very low whittling ability, again many to one behind flat ground knives with efficient edge profiles. It does however work well as a wood scraper.
The point is also fairly obtuse, it can manage just 115 +/- 6 lbs on a 50 lbs push into a phone book. While the tip has a decent length of taper, over an inch long, it still leaves a very obtuse profile on a sabre ground blade of this thickness.
Grip wise, it is pretty much the same in regards to ergonomics regardless of orientation, it really isn't any worse no matter how it is held :
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_sabre.jpg
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_reverse.jpg
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_hammer.jpg
The only real drawback versatility wise is a lack of a choil prevents a high grip for precision work :
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_precision.jpg
Though it could be argued that this really isn't the type of work it is made to do.
What I will be interested in mainly is can the handle construction match the raw strength of the blade. Can it be used for heavy tip work, digging in woods, batoning, and significant prying.
-Cliff
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_military_manix.jpg
It weighs 200 grams with a 1/4" thick sabre ground blade from 58 HRC, stainless steel of a non-specific composition. The handle is 1.5 cm thick and 3.0 cm wide. Very boxy, similar to the G10 grips Strider runs. I would prefer this one slightly due to the index finger cutout, but it is still one of the least ergonomic grips every used. Very boxy with lots of high pressure points. It is also fairly slick and due to the angle of the integral guard, ramping over it is not difficult even in a clean grip.
Cutting ability is low due to the low sabre grind and fairly heavy edge profile. This one has been slighty adjusted from NIB specs, the edge is about 0.035" thick, and a few passes on the 20 on the Sharpmaker rods won't cleanly cut the bevel but hit most of it. Measurement shows it to be 20 +/- 1 degrees, so it is likely just slightly over. The bevel could be radically thinned, the dual thumbstuds would have to be removed, but this isn't planned as it is intended for heavier utility work. I have lots of fine cutting knives already.
However I did some light work with it anyway just to benchmark its performance. In the kitchen it could readily cut light foods which just need a sharp blade like green onions :
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_onions.jpg
and the thick profile was useful in hacking parts of frozen ground beef apart :
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_beef.jpg
However cutting thicker vegetables was problematic, onions could only be crudely chunked :
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_onion_chunks.jpg
Attempting to dice up some carrots, while the Japanese Utility knife tok ~3 lbs, the Fulcrum just cracked off pieces with about 13 lbs. Similar in cutting up a block of cheese, similar force was required :
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_cheese.jpg
Moving on to more utility work, the Fulcrum needed 50 +/- 2 lbs to make a push cut on 3/8" hemp, and its wood cutting ability is also many to one behind something like the Paramiliary. It also binds heavily in thick cardboard, and is near impossible to use to cut thick foam insulation.
For wood work, it has decent heft for chopping, but the very large cross section makes it tend to knock light brush around rather than cut it. It also has very low whittling ability, again many to one behind flat ground knives with efficient edge profiles. It does however work well as a wood scraper.
The point is also fairly obtuse, it can manage just 115 +/- 6 lbs on a 50 lbs push into a phone book. While the tip has a decent length of taper, over an inch long, it still leaves a very obtuse profile on a sabre ground blade of this thickness.
Grip wise, it is pretty much the same in regards to ergonomics regardless of orientation, it really isn't any worse no matter how it is held :
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_sabre.jpg
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_reverse.jpg
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_hammer.jpg
The only real drawback versatility wise is a lack of a choil prevents a high grip for precision work :
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/CliffStamp/extrema%20ratio/fulcrum_precision.jpg
Though it could be argued that this really isn't the type of work it is made to do.
What I will be interested in mainly is can the handle construction match the raw strength of the blade. Can it be used for heavy tip work, digging in woods, batoning, and significant prying.
-Cliff