Facon Review

Joined
Apr 11, 2019
Messages
233
I just received my new Cold Steel Facon. Paid 85% of MSRP. If I recall correctly, this may be the first CS knife for which I had to pay the stupid MAP price. I bought this knife almost for old times' sake, feeling that this might be the last CS knife that I ever get (due to the ownership change and different direction that the new ownership might take the company), although I certainly hope there'll be many more.

It came in a very large purple knife box with no markings on the box, save for a tiny sticker on the end with the price and CS model info. Inside the box, however, there was a round CS paper tag, with a bit of string attached to a tab on the tag. The tag, being black, looks almost like a hockey puck. On both sides, it has the words "COLD STEEL", "World's Strongest, Sharpest Swords", and it says "MADE IN INDIA".

The knife came completely wrapped in a rather tight fitting, sealed plastic bag. The blade was completely coated in oily gunk to prevent rust. After unwrapping and cleaning off all the gunk from the blade, my first impression of this knife was excellent.

The blade is exactly 12 inches, measured from the bolster part of the handle to the point. The widest part of the blade is 2 inches. It appears to be about 3/16 of an inch thick. It was advertised as being 1090 carbon steel. There is nicely done jimping on the back of the blade, mostly for looks but also to catch an opposing blade on the parry and knock it out of an unwary adversary's hand. It is hidden tang construction. The handle is wood and feels pretty good in hand. At the pommel end, there is what I call a keyhole, a recessed nut with two holes into which you can insert a tool to turn the nut and tighten the handle on the tang, if it should ever become loose. The knife has good balance and feels light and fast, although it is a huge knife.

Since it is an Argentine gaucho knife, it does not have a guard. The drop down blade is supposed to keep your fingers off the blade. I would have preferred a coffin handle, like the Laredo, but again, it's a gaucho style knife. The handle is shaped to angle larger and larger towards the pommel, and it does a very good job of keeping the knife in hand.

I will post an update edit once I try this knife out in solo martial arts practice, how it handles, how quick, and so forth.

The sheath is very nice high quality leather. It has the protective tip at the end, like many Windlass Steelcrafts sheaths. There is a fan-like piece of leather at the top of the sheath, designed to keep you from accidentally disemboweling yourself when re-sheathing. The sheath hooks on to your belt with a piece of leather that is secured by two pins. The retention for this sheath is excellent. The knife does not move when I turn the turn the sheath upside down, even when shaking it hard.

Examining the blade closely in the light, I feel that this was hand forged. There are slight imperfections, sort of ripples in the blade, from hammering marks. I think this is almost certainly made by the smiths at Windlass Steelcrafts. Unlike many bargain Windlass bowies, however, the fit and finish of this knife is excellent. It is much, much better quality that the CS 1917 Frontier bowie, which also appears to be made by Windlass. It's light years better than the standard Windlass bowies available from Atlanta Cutlery. Let's hear it for India! They sure did a hell of a job with this one.

It's not often that you get a large production bowie knife that looks exactly like the stock photo in the websites. I'm pretty much blown away by the quality of this knife. I was definitely not expecting this level of quality. This is a must have for bowie knife knuts (you know who you are). Better move quick, there don't seem to be many in stock anywhere.

This is exactly the kind of knife that I fear will disappear from the CS catalog once the new ownership exerts full control. Again, I hope not, but that's been the general trend in all knife companies. Who else makes stuff like this these days? Unfortunately, Ontario Knife Company discontinued the Bagwell bowie series about a decade ago, citing poor sales. Bark River made a similar large knife out of A2 steel called the Edwin Forrest bowie, which I thought about getting, but eventually passed on due to its $300 price tag, and that's no longer available. Atlanta Cutlery sells other Windlass bowies, but the cheap ones are ... meh ... you get what you pay for. So for less than one and half Ben Franklins, I think CS hit one out of the park with the Facon.
 
I've looked hard at the Facon model from afar, I almost bit on it a few times. Based on most reviews, including this one here, it seems to have been received as a very nicely made specimen of it's type.
The pattern just seems to look so much like a chef's knife, that I always pull away from pulling the trigger on one. Still, it seems like a pretty cool knife.
Anyhow, I did a little online research on the origins of this pattern, and I believe that Cold Steel may have mis-named the model with calling it a Facon. The Gauchos of South America did indeed use knives of this type, and there was one general type called a Facon, but those tended to have guards and more of a short sword look, than a chef's knife. I forget which name they tended to call the general purpose chef's type knife, but it was not Facon.
This is a similar situation with the Cold Steel 1917 Navy Cutlass. You see, the original 1917 Navy Cutlass was in fact very closely based on the Dutch Klewang pattern sword. The biggest difference in appearance between the original 1917 Navy Cutlass & the Klewang, was that the 1917 Navy Cutlass had a solid basket guard, not a pierced one as the Klewang had.
If one looks at all three, the Cold Steel 1917 Navy Cutlass, the original 1917 Navy Cutlass, and one of the original Klewangs, (especially one made in USA by Milsco or Vince), the obvious is that the Cold Steel 1917 Navy Cutlass is more closely patterned on the original Klewang, not the US Navy model.
It should have been named the Cold Steel Klewang.
I believe if Cold Steel had simply called their Facon a Gaucho knife, it would have been a better fit. It would have been based on it being a knife pattern that the Gauchos were known to carry, even if it did not specifically name the particular pattern itself.
To be honest, I never understood why Cold Steel never changed their 1917 Navy Cutlass designation, since at some point they must have realized that the designation was simply incorrect.

Here are some pics found online... From top to bottom are the following models:

*Cold Steel 1917 Navy Cutlass

*Original 1917 Navy Cutlass

*Milsco made Klewang




 
Last edited:
For sure, it does have a kitchen knife look, and I did avoid bowies with that kind of look. But there was that old version called the Edwin Forrest, which also looks like a chef's knife. Bark River had that for something like 3 c-notes. They're all sold out of those now. I had passed up on that one, probably the price had a lot to do with it. I liked the Facon's price, so I gave it a chance. It's definitely one of those knives that look better in hand than in online photos.
 
Any updates? would love to hear about usage if the carbon steel held up well. or if used in a traditional Asado cookout. :)
 
I hadn't checked in on bladeforums in quite a while. Happened to drop in today to the CS forum.

No, unfortunately, I still haven't had time to use the Facon knife. But not as busy now, so I should to do an update soon. I got the Facon mostly to use in solo martial arts practice, but I figure I will try to find a piece of wood that I can chop on and test it out a bit.

Also ended up getting the expensive Bark River Edwin Forrest, so I'll be able to do a comparison. The Edwin Forrest showed up a while back in a second run, and this time I didn't let it get away. The BR EF has become my favorite knife for solo practice!

I also ordered the CS Arkansas Toothpick recently. Should get it very soon. Once I get it, I'll post a review of that one too.
 
Back
Top