- Joined
- May 28, 2011
- Messages
- 1,428
Ok, I know this topic has been done, but I read through a lot of old posts and I'm still not satisfied. It seems like a given to me that CRK knives come from the factory with a convex secondary grind. I say this from examining my new and refurbished Sebenzas and also from some old posts on this forum. I have tried touching up my Sebenzas on a Sharpmaker as recommended by CRK and am not happy with the results, precisely because the Sharpmaker is designed for V-grinds and that is not what the Sebenza comes with. So why would CRK recommend using the Sharpmaker to touch up a Sebenza when you would need to reprofile the whole edge first for that to be effective?
So the question is this: Should I have the secondary edge reground to a V-grind and proceed with the Sharpmaker, or try to preserve the convex edge by using the loaded compound/strop and sandpaper/mousepad method? Or worst of all in my opinion, and this is what CRK recommends, just hammer away on the Sharpmaker even though the edge is convex, with the result being some sloppy medium between convex and V?
So the question is this: Should I have the secondary edge reground to a V-grind and proceed with the Sharpmaker, or try to preserve the convex edge by using the loaded compound/strop and sandpaper/mousepad method? Or worst of all in my opinion, and this is what CRK recommends, just hammer away on the Sharpmaker even though the edge is convex, with the result being some sloppy medium between convex and V?