This thread has taken a turn for the nasty.
Who you calling nasty? :grumpy:
I don't know. I work in IT/ 1s & 0s / logical arguments, etc.. Dealing with these constructs, one enters the realm of absolutes. Absolutes work well in math - they are the source of frustration in real life. Reality is more dynamic...
organic, and deserves better.
Agreed, rules are what allow us all to live in close proximity to one another without chaos; zoning
can be a very, very good thing. Still, following absolute rules, say from a computer program, one often sees the minority circumstance where it is counterproductive. Sort of the reason I like having live judges, da's and leo's - they can make those "judgements" where the rules say one thing and reason says another.
Rules are written as a perfect solution to the
majority of circumstances. The human element of enforcement brings reason, compassion and discernment to a situation (the minority) where logical qualifiers fail. I feel that human element is critical and applies to something as mundane as forum moderation (enforcement) and as serious as murder or acts of war.
The spookiest future-SciFi stories are worlds of absolutes.
(As I re-read this, it sounds as if I'm advocating favoritism for a minority. In reality, I find few things more heinous. I *am* advocating that speeding is bad... though, under the right conditions, with someone bleeding on the seat next to you, it should be overlooked to the benefit of a larger concern.)
In a nutshell: protect the pathway of the greatest good, forgiving small evils along the way. Don't hinder that pathway to a greater good by an absolute adherence to, comparatively, minor wrongs.