My story may be wrong, but I believe the decision to change from solid VG-10 to the laminated variety was based on tests made that were posted online. I believe they were by Cliff Stamp (see http://www.cutleryscience.com/reviews/s1_f1_wm.html).
Shortly thereafter, the switch was made to laminated and Fallkniven even posted break test results where clearly, the laminated blades withstood more bending stress before failure. If I'm not mistaken, the laminated blades bend more, too. I am not sure if the switch was made due to these tests or from a different cause.
My take on this is that this was done because the F1 was meant to be a hard use survival knife (for air force pilots), so maybe that was why it may have been advantageous to switch.
Laminated or not, they are great knives, but do you think the switch to laminated was worth it? Are the advantages that great over the solid version?
Shortly thereafter, the switch was made to laminated and Fallkniven even posted break test results where clearly, the laminated blades withstood more bending stress before failure. If I'm not mistaken, the laminated blades bend more, too. I am not sure if the switch was made due to these tests or from a different cause.
My take on this is that this was done because the F1 was meant to be a hard use survival knife (for air force pilots), so maybe that was why it may have been advantageous to switch.
Laminated or not, they are great knives, but do you think the switch to laminated was worth it? Are the advantages that great over the solid version?