• Preorders are LIVE for the 2024 BladeForums Traditional Knife

    Traditional Knife Information Thread - make sure you go in there and read up.

    Requirements: Be a Gold or higher member or have been a member of the forums since 6/2023 with at least 100 posts in the Traditional Forum. Preorder is for people who live in the continental US only, international orders will be separate.

    Delivery expected in Q4 2024, hopefully before the holidays.

    User Name
    Serial number request

Finnish Hiking axe

I have no experience with Roselli's axes, but his puukkos and leukus are first class.

I'd have no problem at all trusting one of his hand forged hatchets or axes.

Another alternative would be to investigate Gransfors Bruks (Sweden) hatchets and axes. You can find them at www.cutsforthknives.com
Daren is a great guy to deal with.

Hope this helps.
 
Alidisaster :

none of the edges were aligned with the handles - most were over an inch out (sighting one eye down handle towards blade).

This is a very common problem, hanging the heads takes time and care to get proper alignment. Even the Gransfors Bruks axes are sloppy in this regard. As for the above axe, considering that it is twice the price of a Gransfors Bruks axe, the choice seems rather clear.

-Cliff
 
The pictured axes look like they might have some advantages over the Gransfors for skinning use (holding them in a "choked up" position). However, for general use, I'd agree with Cliff that the Gransfors may be a better value.
 
I think it would be cheaper to buy from Finland based on the advertized price;) I had the same thought about it as a skinning axe.
 
You can choke up on the GB easily, but they are a little uncomfortable because of the head taper. The Finn axe looks to be a little better in that regard with a dedicated cutout for up close gripping, however comfort would be influenced by the taper and radius of the head in that area. The real argument ender is the fact that they are twice the price of a GB, and are vastly more specialized. It looks like they are mainly hard wood cutting tools. It would be interesting to see a comparison of them vs GB in that area, plus more precision whittling and general light cutting. The edge and overall head geometry would be key. As usual the most important aspect of geometry is ignored, no top down shot.

-Cliff
 
Three messages in one:
Thanks for the info :-) The GB mini hatchet seems unobtainable in the UK.

Did you know GB make a tomahawk? http://www.fine-tools.com/G307361.htm(if so, is it any good)

What are the advantages/disadvantages of a tomahawk vs a hatchet? (bearing in mind I have no desire to use either for self-defence).
 
Alidisaster :

What are the advantages/disadvantages of a tomahawk vs a hatchet?

n general, hatchets have higher performance cutting edges, better edge retention and low impact durablity, more ergonomic and secure handles and a more secure head/handle attachment. Tomahawks have an edge and head which is much more durable in respect to very high impacts, and a head/handle attachment that makes for a very easy field refit of the handle, both of which are critical for throwing, and for handling heavy combat related impacts.

-Cliff
 
I've handled a GB prototype hawk at a show, but haven't seen them readily available for sale in most areas with which I'm familiar. They look pretty nice but, as I recall, were much more expensive than the smaller axes.
 
Kellam has the small for 84.95, and the larger for 89.95.
Excellent forged steel, and attachment. These have a cat cheek profile
which makes them excellent game, and carving pieces. They also will split wood very well, but chopping is not what they do best.

FO
 
Back
Top