I don't get whats the difference between a Ritter and a normal griptilian besides the price..
BM Grip has 154CM steel and the Ritter has S30V. Worth the $60 difference in price? No.
BM Grip has a narrower blade (height-wise, measured from edge to spine). Worth the $60 difference in price? No.
The Ritter grip's blade is stonewashed, pretty cool looking, and it has the Doug Ritter logo. Worth the $60 difference in price? No.
Ken was saying that, because of the wider chord measurement of the blade, the edge would be thinner and hence cut better. I can;t speak to that because I don;t know, but: Worth the $60 difference in price? No.
Doug Ritter says the BM Griptilian was actually designed
after he sent in his design for the knives which would eventually bear his logo. Now, there's a little more to it than that, but that's the essence. In other words, his knife isn;t based on the BM Grip, rather the Grip is based oon his design. Worth the $60 difference in price? No.
All things combined, all differences together, Worth the $60 difference in price? No.
But, as I said before, it has
something.... a look... a feeling.... maybe just a smoother design, coupled with the idea that Ritter designed it, that allows me to consider it over the BM knife, despite the 100% cost difference.
Then you can add in , maybe as icing on the cake, the premium steel, the stonewashing, the wider chord of the blade, and now each individual can decide whether it's worth the extra money.