Even a sharp 'convex edge' should actually be more V-shaped at the apex to actually be as narrow (in apex width) and as sharp as possible. Convexing has some advantages in the steel behind the apex, such as reducing drag or binding in cutting thick & tough material with thicker blades. But the edge itself will always be sharper if it remains as nearly V-shaped as it can be. Done as such, it reduces or eliminates the rounding at the apex that'll happen if one deliberately tries to 'convex the edge'. I tend to believe that concept, as it's worded, is a misleading one, creating an assumption the convex must go all the way to the apex (which dramatically widens the edge angle, rounds off the apex and effectively dulls it).
So, for actual sharpening, you'd do better to treat it like any knife with a standard V-edge and maintain it as such. With practice over time, you can then modify your sharpening habits to blend a convex into the bevel shoulders behind the edge, after sharpening it to a crisp v-shaped apex in the conventional manner. The key is to work the convex behind the edge at a held angle that's lower than the actual edge angle, so you're NOT altering the crisp V-edged apex in the process.
Edited to add:
Looking at images of the Reiff F6 knives online, the edge grind looks about as conventional as with most V-edged knives. Whatever subtle convex is there is likely the result of edge grinding/finishing on a belt grinder with just enough slack to keep it slightly convex behind the apex (and/or at the shoulders of the bevels) and barely short of truly flat bevels. That would be the same way many so-called 'V-edged' grinds are made on factory knives, the vast majority of which would also have some very subtle convex in the bevels. The point here being, there's likely not enough convex to be concerned about for the sake of maintenance sharpening.