- Joined
- Mar 7, 2003
- Messages
- 1,321
We should not compare a carbon blade to a high alloyed 154CM blade, because the carbon would always take much more abuse than the 154 CM.
We should compare blades from the same stuff and ignore tolerances from manufacturing. If the knives were of comparable weight, why not put them in a vice and bend them just to see, that modern folders are able to take more force than the tip.
From that point folders are as strong as fixed blades. There were tests in the german knife magazin, rums in the vice and bend to the side, there is not much of a difference.
I personally prefer a small fixed. It is just a few centimeters longer than a folded AFCK and works. Yes, a larger handle would be nice sometimes, but the simplicity of a non - existing locking mechanic is a real adb´vantage to me.
We should compare blades from the same stuff and ignore tolerances from manufacturing. If the knives were of comparable weight, why not put them in a vice and bend them just to see, that modern folders are able to take more force than the tip.
From that point folders are as strong as fixed blades. There were tests in the german knife magazin, rums in the vice and bend to the side, there is not much of a difference.
I personally prefer a small fixed. It is just a few centimeters longer than a folded AFCK and works. Yes, a larger handle would be nice sometimes, but the simplicity of a non - existing locking mechanic is a real adb´vantage to me.