- Joined
- Jan 24, 2005
- Messages
- 2,792
I have wondered about the longevity of liner locks and frame locks, which as noted above are just springs. Any engineering types out there who could shed light? I like to store liner locks in the open positiion, since when closed, the spring is compressed. Am I being overly anal?
I wonder if eventually the liner/frame lock will eventually be made obsolete for that reason, and also because it is not truly ambidextrous, and because it appears to be difficult to make a perfect one.
Although not a knife expert (I come to this forum mostly to learn), from a lifetime in photography I know a great deal about cameras, at least those that use film.
Among photographers, there has always been controversy about whether to store equipment with shutters wound or released to reduce tension on the springs. In earlier times, I used to store my cameras with shutters tripped until, eventually, I learned that holding tension on a spring (within reason) doesn't affect its tensile strength. What does is repeated flexing, so it doesn't really matter how a spring is stored but how many times it is cycled (some high end cameras, like Hasselblad, were designed to be stored with the shutter cocked.)
Assuming basic metalurgy applies, likely the same is true with a liner lock leaf spring, which is never put under extreme pressure, anyway. A well made shutter can withstand up to hundreds of thousands of cycles before its tiny spring needs to be replaced, so I imagine it would take a lifetime (or more) of constant use to actually weaken that huge, by comparison, part of a liner lock. Wear on other components would cause problems first.
Therefore, I have no anguuish about storing my knives closed. That said, I don't like liner locks, but for other reasons.