Man,
Perhaps it is so that some people who study or have an interest in Japanese-style blades are more concerned with the classification, terminology, and designation of the blades, knives and swords.
I think Robert makes a good point in what he is stating because he has knowledge of the definitions and classifications of Japanese blade design. I believe he wants people to be aware about the designs.
For example, the katana, the wakisashi, and the tanto are all sword styles delineated by the lenght of the blades. A tanto is generally a sword, with a guard, with a blade around 12". An aikuchi is a tanto but without a guard. A hamadashi is a the same but with a small guard. A kwaiken is a utilitarian knife, generally with a shorter than 12" blade that was commonly unmounted. I've read that it was generally carried by women as a utility knife. A small utility-type knife was known as a kiridashi. There was no designated "tanto point" and this usuage is of Western design. The maker that popularized the chisel grind, geometric "tanto" point was Phill Hartsfield, who also was the first to do the epoxy cord wraps that are now very popular. Incidently, Hartsfield doesn't call it "tanto." Again, the definitions become clouded because he uses the term "yoroi toshi" or "armor-piecer" which was actually a traditional Japanese design that didn't look anything like the geo tanto. Also to clarify, specific blade styles were given names, such as Shinogi Zukuri, Shobu Zukuri, and Hira Zukuri. Most traditional Japanese tantos, I've read were of the Hira design. Perhaps Robert can post some pictures of the various designs (I don't know how).
I for one like the modern designs. They were some of the first knives that I was first interested in. But later, through some study, I discovered that there was more than just "chisel-tip, Japanese-style tanto." There is an entire field of study regarding the traditional Japanese blades that is absolutely fascinating, especially if someone also has an interest in Japanese sword art.
[This message has been edited by DrRMJ (edited 03-10-2001).]
[This message has been edited by DrRMJ (edited 03-10-2001).]
[This message has been edited by DrRMJ (edited 03-10-2001).]