For the money , do you think anything beats the Buck 110?

Status
Not open for further replies.
If a given lock design has a better strength to weight ratio and handles wear and tear better with essentially the same ergonomics, it's a better lock. You don't need to be trying to stand on it or chop a titanium cow carcass in half to get a benefit from that. I'm by no means a cold steel fanboy, but there are tri-ad lock knives under $30 and under 3 oz... which definitely beats the buck 110 for everyday usability for the money.
"Better" is highly subjective.

So are preferences in weight, thickness, lock style etc.
 
Yeah, like the steel, blade geometry, handle ergonomics, weight, and cost. All of which there are better options than the buck 110.

Even if the subtext of this thread is actually "for the money do you think anything beats the buck 110, but any lock design better than a lockback is ridiculous, and you can't tell the difference with any steel better than 420hc, and murica Heck yeah"... the answer is still a spitfire or a slim select as others have pointed out.

Yeah well, that’s just your opinion which is subjective and some of which are unwarranted ie; “racist” accusations. Totally unnecessary!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top