Fusion Hunter-Revolver and Salute

Fletcher Knives

STEEL BREATHING BLADE MAESTRO
Moderator
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Messages
5,483
The SOG Fusion Line
Mistake or Triumph?
by Dylan Fletcher


1.jpg

2.jpg


Log onto one of the popular knife discussion forums these days, search for threads about SOG knives, and undoubtedly you’ll see a number of threads questioning the quality of SOG’s Fusion line. It seems that there is no shortage of people that have damned the Fusion line without giving it a chance. Some say that SOG has lost their way and sold out to the “mall ninjas” in order to make a buck. Some ask, “why is SOG discontinuing all the tools that made them famous and built their loyal market?” Whatever the statements or questions may be, the general theme is the same. To these people, SOG has made a grave mistake and forgotten what made them SOG Knives.

Due to all the questions and statements I was reading on the forums, I was personally interested in the quality of the Fusion line. This isn’t a review where a company sent a knife to a writer for review for a magazine article. No one got paid, no bribes, nothing. I’m not saying that happens all the time with other people reviewing knives. I’m just saying it didn’t happen this time. I contacted SOG and asked if I could have a crack at a couple of Fusion knives to satisfy my own curiosity and do a review for the forums. I even offered to send the knives back when I was done. I also told SOG that I was planning on posting my findings for everyone to see and it would be completely honest. My stipulations were that they would get an honest review, but they wouldn’t have any influence on the findings. The only thing they would be allowed to do would be to help me with any corrections to technical specs or facts that I was incorrect about concerning the history of the knives.

Some time ago, SOG underwent a change. Originally, many of their knives were produced between the United States and Seki, Japan. Many of the knives that won our hearts, such as the various Bowies, the seemingly indestructible folders, and perhaps the most notable, original Tigershark, were produced in Japan. SOG, in an effort to keep up with the times, evaluated what was selling and what wasn’t. They then decided to produce some new designs and drop some of the ones that were no longer selling in great enough numbers to warrant further production costs. Also, they decided to shift some of the production to less expensive materials and labor in other areas of the world in order to keep the cost reasonable for the customer while maintaining the ability to produce new products and continue their innovation. While some changes were made to materials, that doesn’t necessarily mean that they were to inferior materials. Many of their tools have been stepped up over the years, not stepped down. Anyone who has ever run a business that produces and sells a product will tell you that this is pretty much the standard model for staying in business and thriving. If a product no longer has the demand, you stop making it. If overhead costs rise enough that it drives up your price to the customer, you find ways to cut overhead. Most importantly, and the purpose of the Fusion line, if you want to produce products for everyone, and not just those who can spend serious cheese on an item, create a product that is affordable to everyone.

This is where the Fusion line comes in. Despite how much most of us knife and gear snobs would wish, not everyone has the money to spend on high priced gear. Some of us have to get what we can afford. Whether it be because we just don’t have the dough for a big ticket purchase, or because we destroy or lose stuff too often to warrant high priced gear. For whatever reason, we need a high quality product that we can afford on a tight budget. SOG’s Fusion line is an effort to meet that demand. According to SOG’s marketing, they use the highest quality materials possible to produce great tools at affordable prices.

It should be taken into consideration, that this wasn’t some one day or even weekend test. I tested both of these knives over a period of more than a month and I’m not talking a little here a little there. I mean every day I was using these knives. The day I received these knives, I took my usual EDC knife out of my pocket and replaced it with the Salute. I used it for everything I would use my usual EDC for, cutting up boxes and packing tape, snatching strips off motorcycle crates, cutting rope and paracord, opening containers, cutting cans and plastic bottles apart, making my lunch, you name it. I use a knife throughout the day more than most people use their cell phone. As for the Hunter Revolver, I came up with little projects almost every day to use it for, not many of them had a lot of practical application, but all were thought up to push the knife and see how it performed. I wanted to really take my time to see how these knives hold up, because no one buys a tool to use over the span of one day or a weekend. They buy it to use until it breaks.

We’ll start with the Fusion Hunter Revolver.

6.jpg


Here are the technical specs straight from SOG Knives.

Blade Length…………...4.75" x .15"
Overall Length…………10"
Weight………………….6.0 oz.
Edge……………………Straight/Double Tooth Saw
Steel……………………440A
HRC…………………....56-58
Handle…………………Glass-Reinforced Nylon
Finish…………………..Satin
Sheath………………….Nylon
Suggested Retail Price…$40.00

I dug a little deeper on the materials, because I like to know what EVERYTHING is made out of. The Fusion Revolvers liners are 420 stainless. The washers in the pivot are nylon. Also the screws and locking pin are stainless as well. All of these are good, well-respected, tried and true materials that you could expect to find in a lot of high quality knives.

Let’s first talk about the design. I have wanted to try a revolver for a long time now. I’ve read a lot of information about the history behind the knife and have read nothing but great reviews about the original Revolvers (pre-Fusion line). Unfortunately, acquiring one just never really happened. Every time I had the dough, there would be something else it had to be spent on, be it a legitimate necessity or just some other knife I thought I needed more. Either way, I missed the boat. By the time I got serious about getting one, all of the originals were gone. You can still find them here and there, but people want at least full price if not more for them, where as you used to be able to find some pretty smokin’ deals on them when they were abundant.

The design of this knife is very cool. The man who came up with it is Robbie Roberson. The idea is that you have a fixed blade/full tang knife and a fixed blade/full tang saw in the same package, being able to switch between the two with only the push of a button and a half revolution of the blade, hence the name “Revolver”. The way the knife is designed, with the pivot screw, locking pin, and safety stop all there, you basically have fixed blade strength in either position, saw or knife. Instead of all the force being applied to only a pivot screw and one locking mechanism separate from the blade, as you would on a folder, it is distributed among these three points along half the length of the steel, effectively turning it into the tang. Knowing that you have this kind of strength really gives you confidence in the knife.

The handle itself is extremely grippy, so much so that I would recommend gloves for extended use. If you’re just using it here and there for maybe an hour at a time, I’m sure you wouldn’t notice any serious discomfort, but you can tell by holding it that this handle will surely create some hotspots after prolonged hard use. One thing is for sure, the curves of the handle and the grip the texture gives ensures that this knife is absolutely NOT going to slip in the hand. There is a lanyard hole at the butt of the handle. Inside the black glass-reinforced nylon are the 420 stainless steel liners and the locking mechanism itself.

One thing I noticed right off the bat was a slight flex to the handles inward toward the blade when squeezed really hard. I wondered if this was a sign of weakness and something different from the original Revolver, being part of the new Fusion line. Maybe it had lost some of the strength through changing materials. I contacted Chris Cashbaugh, from SOG’s Marketing department, Robbie Roberson, the man behind the design, and also a few random Revolver owners from an internet forum to ask about this. Chris told me that SOG changed nothing as far as the materials used in the handles when they switched this model to the Fusion line and everyone else I contacted confirmed that the flex was also a characteristic of the previous models. Chris said that the only thing that was changed was the blade material and some tooling on the handle to make it more grippy. Also, everyone reassured me that even though there is slight flex in the handle, NO ONE had yet had one give up the ghost on them. Given some of the people I asked and what I know of how hard they use their knives, I have no doubt that the strength is there.

The sheath that comes with this knife is very basic. I must admit, I loved the original leather revolver sheath and would love to have one, sooooo if anyone out there has one they want to give away, my contact info is available. The new sheath included with the Fusion Revolver is a very inexpensive nylon job. Now here’s the deal. Is it an expensive leather or kydex rig? Nope. Does the sheath work? Yes it does. Does it hold the knife and keep it from falling out or cutting or stabbing anything you don’t want it to? Sure as hell does! It’s just a sheath. If you want fancy, have a cool custom sheath made or buy a more expensive knife that comes with a more elaborate sheath but this thing does its job.

The blade is made from 440A, where as the original Revolver sported a blade of AUS8. The obvious question is, “is the blade decent?” The answer is no, it’s not just decent. It’s actually surprisingly good. To tell you the truth, I had written off what I thought to be “crap steels” long ago, and 440A was on my throw-away list. I had lumped it in with the cheapo gunshow knives of my youth and thought I had raised the bar and moved onto “real steel” a long time ago. I can honestly say that I’m going to start really looking at all the 440A knives I had walked by with my nose in the air and see if there are some good user designs like this Revolver. The blade locking pin slid in and out of the hole in the blade easily when the button was pushed. The blade rotated like butta. The whole mechanism worked flawlessly. I did notice just a tiny bit of play in the blade front to back when it was locked into position. After examining the holes in the blade, I noticed that they were just a hair larger in diameter than the locking pin. I assumed that if you made the tolerances too close, the pin wouldn’t move in and out of the hole as easily and could snag, but I don’t like to make assumptions. Again, I checked with all the usual suspects above to see if this was a new thing or the same as the original. They confirmed that this was exactly the same as the original Revolvers and Robbie also confirmed what I suspected about the tolerance issue. The blade’s cutting edge and gut hook edge were hair popping sharp straight out of the box. So much so that I actually recommend that you be very careful when drawing the knife out of the sheath. If the gut hook snags the retaining Velcro strap, you’ll never know. It will just fall to the ground, having been silently lased off. While the primary grind wasn’t perfectly symmetrical, all of the edges were very uniform and even.

Before I tested this knife, I will admit that putting a serious amount of pressure on a knife… with a sharp blade… that spins… out of the HANDLE… had me kind of apprehensive. I mean what if they lock failed? What if the locking pin somehow let go and this thing sailed right through my hand? Not to mention, this is the new “affordable” line, like as in less costly. What if all those people were right and this new stuff wasn’t exactly strong? I really like my fingers. I mean what’s not to love? This one goes to the market. This ones stays home. This one over here, you know what he likes?... Roast beef. You get the idea. Robbie was right there to make me feel more at ease.

“The lock up on the originals has been amazingly strong for many years. There is also a safety block within the handle that makes them even stronger. Notice the angle on the end of the saw blade, this angle gives the saw extra security and will not allow it to rotate through the handle even if the lock pin fell out............which is exactly how I tested my Revolvers to make sure they could still be used in the woods even it the lock pin came out. I removed my lock pin and put a green stick in the lock hole and used mine for days without failure of any kind..........a green stick locked the blade.”

Well there you have it… a green stick. Along with Chris assuring me that nothing in the handles had changed, all it took was working with this knife for a few minutes to feel completely comfortable with it. With the way the blade rotates, even if the lock and the safety block failed, there is virtually no way that this thing could bite you. In either saw mode or knife mode, you’re hand will always be hit by a blunt spine, not a sharp blade. Again, very well thought out design.

Continued...
 
Testing this knife was pretty basic. Cut, saw, cut, saw. First, it got the arm hair test. Unfortunately, there was no arm hair to cut as I had already sacrificed it whilst sharpening other knives, so it got the leg hair. The hair jumped off my leg when it saw this blade coming. This thing was seriously sharp. Then I moved onto slicing paper. The blade flew through it with no tears, indicating that the edge had no micro flaws that would have caused drag or snags. I probably went through a quarter of a ream of paper just because of how pleasant it was to cut with this knife. After that, I moved it to food prep. I decided to make a hearty stir-fry with beef and chicken. Since I hadn’t had a chance to test the gut hook on some wild game, I felt I had to at least try it on something, so I bought a whole chicken and used the gut hook as much as possible. My wife thought I looked rather silly cutting the skin off the chicken in strips. I also used the knife to de-bone the chicken, cut up the meat, trim the steak, cube it up, cut the vegetables, etc. I know that this might seem kind of easy, but the light testing is necessary. After all, how much would it have said about the knife if it had dulled out or let me down during such a simple task as food prep. It did just fine.

Next I moved onto some more strenuous cutting. I took the knife to work with me to break down and cut up cardboard boxes for a day. Normally this would be EDC folder work, but this work will kill any edge in no time so it was a test I wanted to do at least once. Cardboard is a rough and tough enough material to dull any knife out so seeing how long a blade will last is a good measure of how well it will hold an edge. Also, cardboard will dull it out without dirtying it all up so you can really get a look at the edge to see if it just dulls out or rolls or what have you. Right off the bat, I ran the gut hook the full length of a 2 ft box just to see how well it cut. It flew through it no problem. Then, I really got to work. I went through probably 60 boxes of various sizes. After a third of them, I definitely started to notice some drag, but not too bad. It maintained a good working edge almost to the end. By the time I was done, it was completely dull. I examined the edge and it had nicely dulled out without rolling significantly. Now this told me a lot. The steel, while not performing quite as well as you would expect a high carbon steel or the like, still held a working edge through a lot of cutting. It dulled out just a bit faster than my Kershaw, just about the same speed as my SAK’s. In fact, I would say it performed very similar to your typical Victorinox blade. I’ve used a Victorinox OHT to do this same amount of box work more times than I can count and this thing ran right at the same speed. Bringing the edge back was no problem. It is extremely easy to re-sharpen this 440A. A hair popping edge takes only a couple of minutes to coerce from a completely dull blade.

Every chance I got, I went out to the woods behind my job or the woods by my house and did some sawing and whittling. Testing this saw out was like discovering Glenlivet Scotch. I instantly knew I found my perfect match. I don’t care for the big folding saws that you can get from camping stores and hardware stores because they’re just a little too bulky. They do remove material extremely fast, but to me they’re just not worth the added bulk. While I like the saws on my SAK’s and multitools, they’re just not quite big enough to be quick and they can only saw through relatively small branches. It tires me out trying to get through a good 2” limb. The Revolver in the saw mode is PERFECT. It’s not too big and not too small. This saw absolutely flies through wood. I would actually say that it is one of the most efficient saws that I’ve used. The finger grooves and texture on the handle give you great purchase, it’s extremely comfortable, and the saw itself cuts in both directions so removing material is fast fast. The big selling point to me is the size.

12.jpg

13.jpg

14.jpg

15.jpg

16.jpg

17.jpg

18.jpg


After the sawing, I would just aimlessly whittle the wood down to nubs. I will say that the hair popping edge goes away lightening fast. However, this steel will maintain a working edge for a surprisingly long time. I thought for sure that it would disappoint me, but it just held onto that working edge. As with the cardboard, it certainly was no 1095, but it held up just like a SAK blade. Again, bringing the edge back was no problem. It was actually so fast to sharpen up that it kind of outweighed, for me, the speed with which it lost its edge. I can honestly say that this blade held up a lot longer than I thought it would. I will admit that I had completely prepared myself to give its edge holding ability a bad review, but this thing turned me right around. It really destroyed what I thought I knew about that “trash 440A” steel. Also, the gut hook worked great for pruning all the little sticks from the branches after I had sawed them off the trees. Just position the gut hook, give it a good snatch, some times two, and it worked like a champ. Having had so much fun using the saw out in the woods, I found myself outside my garage at home sawing apart my good 2x4 stash. I’m sure my neighbors thought I had lost it. Luckily, I’m already “that crazy knife making guy” so they weren’t bothering me with any questions.

Continued...
 
Here is a small tree that had fallen across my trail. Perfect test for the Revolver.
7.jpg

8.jpg

9.jpg

10.jpg

11.jpg


I told myself in the beginning that I wouldn’t baton this knife. I thought it was just a little too close to destruction testing when you’re talking about such a soft steel. Nonsense. Now let me say here that I don’t recommend anyone else do this. It is a bit much on anything with moving parts. I batonned the blade through quite a few of the 2x4’s, with the grain. I wasn’t willing to try across the grain. I was careful to make sure I had enough spine to smack with the baton as to not accidentally whack the gut hook portion. I’m willing to bet that the gut hook itself is actually a stress riser point in the blade and impact past that point toward the tip would eventually result in a break. It held up fine. All I had to do was tighten up the pivot screw a little afterwards. At this point it wasn’t surprising. My mind had finally wrapped itself around the idea that maybe 440A wasn’t such a soft steel after all. In addition to all the wood I demolished, I also tested the knife's cutting ability on several other materials such as webbing, rope, plastic crate bindings, etc. I kept coming back to the same conclusion. Its edge holding ability was just like a …you guessed it, SAK blade.

Now, let’s move onto the next knife SOG sent me to try out, the Fusion Salute. The Salute is SOG’s tactical folder for the Fusion line. It comes in two blade styles, bead blasted satin and black oxide. Other than that, they are exactly the same.

4.jpg

5.jpg


Here are the technical specs for the Fusion Salute.

Blade Length………..3.625" x .12"
Overall Length………8.25"
Weight………………4.2 oz.
Edge…………………Straight
Steel…………………8Cr13MoV
HRC…………………52-54
Handle………………G-10
Finish………………..Bead Blasted or Black Oxide
Includes Reversible Pocket Clip
Suggested Retail ……Price $45.00

As with the Revolver, I asked more questions about the materials used and everything is the same stainless and washers used in the Revolver, other than the blade steel.

Again, let’s touch on the design. You can tell straight away looking at this knife that it is a tactical folder. The handle has a lot of jimping and exposed liner areas that would make it stick perfectly in someone’s gloved hand. The blade tapers out to a good point that looks like it would provide great stabbing penetration, has thumb jimping and sports a thumb stud for fast deployment. The pocket clip on this folder is of SOG’s signature “low-riding in the pocket” fashion. This is very handy for anyone who doesn’t want to advertise that they’re carrying a folder. Also, the clip itself is very small and discrete, while being very strong. I found that it had just the right amount of tension to it and space from the handle. It was very easy to draw without too much drag and it didn’t snag at all on the way out. You don’t need anymore than that for a good pocket clip. In the clip, you’ll notice a hole. Under this hole is a screw that let’s you switch the clip from one side of the handle to the other so it can easily be converted for a south paw. One extremely cool feature on this knife is the new adjustable thumb stud. SOG has come up with a thumb stud that can be tweaked for each individual user without any trouble. That might not sound like a big deal, but I found it very convenient. Another thing you’ll notice about this knife right off the bat is that it’s a lock-back. I think a lot of us have gotten used to seeing frame-locks and liner-locks on just about everything these days. You’d be hard pressed to find a tac knife that isn’t one of those two configurations. I’ve actually seen several people lately asking various knife companies to move back to the lock-back style. Well, here ya go. I must admit, I haven’t used a lock-back for quite a while now and I found it refreshing, though, it did take me a little while to get reintroduced to closing a lock-back with one hand.

Here you can see how discrete the knife is in the pocket.
3.jpg


Continued...
 
Honestly, I don’t care for the overall design, but that’s just me. I’m not really into the tactical stuff so it didn’t appeal to me visually, which I think is the draw for most people who are into this style. Although, I will say that if an individual is purchasing this knife for its intended application, it would probably serve them spectacularly well. Also, the rather liberal use of jimping and exposed liners creates too many hot spots for extended use. By extended use, I mean like more than 30 minutes at a time. While these things are great for someone who uses the knife for fighting with gloved hands, or for limited amounts of time with bare hands, for the average user, is just too rough on the dermis to use for hours at a time. There is a large portion of exposed liner toward the butt of the knife. You can clearly see the area I’m talking about. Without gloves on, this area is just a bit uncomfortable. If you use your pocketknife every once in a while to open a bag of chips, cut some box tape, open a letter, or even carve on something for a little while, it’ll be just fine. One of the first things I did with this knife when I got it was use it to carve a back-scratcher. By the time I was done, a couple of hours later, I had some decent blisters pulled up.

19.jpg

20.jpg


As far as the fit and finish goes, this thing is top notch. It’s hard to tell with all the jimping, but everything is lined up very well and it actually, just from a finish standpoint, looks like an expensive folder. It has some good heft in the hand, which I do like, and has a very stout feel to it. It definitely feels like a tough knife that can take some abuse. The blade locks home with a good snap like the slide slamming forward on a Wilson Combat 1911. It just has that “everything is right” sound to it.

The blade of this knife is made out of 8Cr13MoV. Now, if you’re like me, you may have been straying away from blade steels with more letters and numbers than a car’s VIN number. Every time I look at that stuff all I see is “13…ellamenno…something-er-other…bla bla bla…and a half”. I understand that it’s giving you more precise information about the content of the steel, but here’s the fact, I’m not a metallurgist and don’t know enough about what amounts of what make it slightly this way or that. If you ramble off the usual names like 440A B or C, 1095, O1, A2, etc., I’ve been reading about them and using them long enough to know that this one is better at corrosion resistance and this one is better at holding an edge. I was under the impression that most of the time, when you see all those letters and numbers, it was the makers way of not having to stamp “410 crap” on the side of the blade. That may be true with some others, but with this steel, that is not the case. While this may not be a super steel or one of the more expensive steels you’re used to finding in higher end folders, this stuff is no slouch. If you’ve been reading up on other companies that have more affordable lines, you might have run across another big name in the industry, Spyderco, and their affordable line, the Bird Series. Many knife users who would bash the Fusion line have already embraced the Bird line and said, “well, it’s not quite as tops as the standard Spydies, but for the money, you can’t beat it.” Guess what, if you start looking up the specs on a lot of their popular, widely accepted and beloved Bird folders, you’ll see a familiar face… 8Cr13MoV. That’s right. While 8Cr13MoV might not be available on the Busse Combats… yet, it’s certainly nothing to spit on. My guess is that it won’t be too long before Jerry Busse jumps on the bandwagon here and you start seeing their budget 8Cr13MoV line… with the much smaller price of about 6 gazillion dollars as appose to the normal 8 gazillion you’d pay for INFI. (I love ya Jerry.) With all that said, let’s get on to the testing.

The Salute had to stand its ground against my usual EDC knife, the Kershaw Junkyard Dog II.
21.jpg


As I said in the beginning, I made this my EDC knife the day it arrived. It was used to do every task that my usual pocket knife would be used to do and a whole lot more, for well over a month. With some of the cutting tests I performed with this knife, I compared it against a Kershaw Junkyard Dog II. I tried both side by side on paper, rope, webbing, boxes, plastic bottles, tin cans, wire, basically everything I could find to cut. Now although the Salute had to be sharpened a little sooner, it certainly didn’t fall too far behind. The working edge actually held up really well. When I made the back-scratcher I talked about before, I did the whole job, about 2 hours of carving, without having to stop and sharpen it. In fact, I still used it for plenty more after that before I finally had to break down and bring the edge back. What this tells me is that while you might have to sharpen it more often than one of the more expensive, harder steels, you won’t be doing it often enough to be bothered. Bottom line, this is a good quality knife for the money and there is absolutely no reason to bash the quality. The quality is there.

The Salute sitting on top of a mountain of its casualties.
23.jpg


So to sum up, my conclusion is that these knives are definitely worth the cheese. For the price, I doubt you would be disappointed with them. Now I can’t speak for the entire Fusion line… unless of course SOG wants me to test all of them, but when it comes to what I’ve seen so far, SOG hit a homerun. Now keep in mind that I didn’t abuse these knives. If you abuse any tool, it will fail. As long as you take care of these knives and use them as they are intended, you’ll have no problems. Anyone can buy these knives and feel like they got plenty of quality knife for their money. As for the Hunter Revolver in particular, I’m in love. This knife has impressed the pants off me and I’m really glad I got to test one out. Like I said before, it has forced me to look more closely at the 440A blades I had previously given the bird to. Not to mention the saw on this thing. I just can’t get over it. If you have a few extra bucks, seriously, buy one of these. You’ll be glad you gave it a try. I’m going to be recommending this knife to every blade enthusiast I know.

Postscript:
After completing this review, I sent it to Chris Cashbaugh at SOG to make sure that all my specs and history facts were correct. Then, we talked on the phone for a little while and discussed something that I felt I absolutely had to add to this review. It seems that SOG is stepping up their game one more time. In addition to adding several new models to the SOG line for 2010, they are also doing away with the Fusion label. SOG has decided that over the next few months, they will be integrating all of the Fusion tools into the standard SOG name. What does this mean for you? Well, the Fusion products were considered almost a separate entity from SOG itself, much like a sister company, and they had a different warranty from the SOG line. The SOG knives carry a lifetime warranty. The Fusion knives, a one-year warranty. Once the Fusion knives are moved over to the SOG name, they will carry the same lifetime warranty that we enjoy with out high dollar SOG tools. Also, they will be shipped in standard SOG packaging. Keep checking the SOG website and publications for news on the change and also check out the new models. I think I see a few more I need to test already!
 
Nice review bro.......Great pics!! Not my cup o tea, but an interesting knife none the less....

Great job!
 
Wow, just a great review Dylside......thanks for your efforts. That Revolver is a pretty cool idea - not sure on the gut hook, but this would be a great camping / bush / garden knife.
 
Very well done review, Dylside. Like the poster above, I like the idea of the revolver, though not necessarily the execution. Gut hook? Bleah.
 
Dylan, thanks for taking the time to do this review. You used the knives the way they were ment to be used and showed that which is what I like to see. Nice pictures. Half expected you to be making chairs or a shelter with the Hunter Revolver.

This summer I'm heading into the national forest to practice my Wilderness skills and will be using my old school Seal Revolver to make a shelter and other things. Keep up the good work.


Edited to add: Did you get a chance to compare the Revolvers saw to that on the Team Leader Suvivor? Would love to know how they compare. Thanks,

Heber
 
Dylan, thanks for taking the time to do this review. You used the knives the way they were ment to be used and showed that which is what I like to see. Nice pictures. Half expected you to be making chairs or a shelter with the Hunter Revolver.

This summer I'm heading into the national forest to practice my Wilderness skills and will be using my old school Seal Revolver to make a shelter and other things. Keep up the good work.


Edited to add: Did you get a chance to compare the Revolvers saw to that on the Team Leader Suvivor? Would love to know how they compare. Thanks,

Heber

I did not get a chance to as I don't have a TLS, but I don't imagine the the TLS's saw would be as comfortable to use due to the handle shape. Then again, I have no idea. Might be just fine. I do know that the saw on the TLS is very capable and is a real saw, as apposed to the wannabe saw teeth you see on the spine of so many other knives.
 
Good reviews. I have the original Seal Revolver and it's a good tool. There is some play in the blade due to the way it had to be designed but I never felt like it would fail or present a danger in use. Very light and innovative.
 
Good reviews man! I just got the revolver as well. Looks like it can dish it out and take it! Cant wait to give it a once over in my neck of the woods.
 
I have been looking at them like yourself, on the fence.
Good review, do they make it without the guthook in the fusion line, just have no use for them.
 
Brad "the butcher";7756942 said:
I have been looking at them like yourself, on the fence.
Good review, do they make it without the guthook in the fusion line, just have no use for them.

They make a version of it that looks just like the SEAL Pup. Here it is.
rev7_250px.jpg
 
Dylside, my sincere thanks to you for all the hard work and trouble you spent on this review.

It was done like an expert and I would say you should be writing reviews for an outdoor magazine somewhere. :)

The pictures were very well done as was the entire review.

I take my hat off to you. :thumbup:

Chris is at Shot show and very busy I'm certain but will be commenting on this as soon as he is able to I'm sure.

My thanks again........


Robbie Roberson. ;)
 
No problem at all Robbie. Thanks for the great design and answering the questions I had.
 
Last edited:
Dylan,

A very thorough and well written review. You may have a future in the writing business!
You have given me thoughts of acquiring SOG tools and knives that I had really not considered before. Good job.

CP
 
Back
Top