- Joined
- Feb 3, 2004
- Messages
- 7,119
This is not a winnable argument. There is no arguing the fact that Chinese manufacturers can and do make quality knives. There is also no arguing that stealing intellectual property is wrong. So while you can honestly say that some clones, counterfeits and knockoffs are very well-made, you cannot honestly say that theft is excusable.Have 2 Ganzo auto knives, G17-b and G7211-gr. Neither is a rip-off of ANY design I can see; both claim to be 440c and from the way they sharpen and hold an edge I'm inclined to
believe it.
I've been written up by the mods for anti-China remarks and probably deserved it but I'm at a loss to feel the animosity for Ganzo. If they ripped the Axis design I'm sorry for that but
the steel they use is far better than the usual Chinese alphabet garbage.
The problem is that in their zeal to promote the ethical argument against theft, some folks are willing to lie about the quality of the products the thieves produce . . . products these folks have no personal experience with. They don't seem to be aware that by doing that, they weaken the ethical argument. After all, who wants to discuss the morality of theft with a liar? Still, two wrongs don't make a right.
My suggestion? Disregard the rantings of those who disparage the products and concentrate instead on whether you want to do business with manufacturers that engage in thievery.
Carry on . . .
Last edited: