Most people these days will buy a knife the least expensive way possible, and the majority of manufacturers are well aware of this. Besides, it would take a considerable amount of time to HRC all of the blades, even a sprint run, and if some are not up to spec they would have to be trashed. My original point here was that if you want a hard science, spend the money and order a custom knife. If you can live with a little variation buy a production knife, carry it, and don't worry about it.
So when they find that the blades aren't up to spec they're doing quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC)? Which, I'd argue is a pretty important thing to do. QA/QC is time consuming, that's factored into the cost. Also, I want to point out, while it's likely most people will try to buy whatever product as least expensive as possible
. However, that is likely
because they don't value the labor that goes into (QA/QC included) making said product, regardless of origin of manufacture. Maybe I'm the odd one out, though aren't raw materials the least expensive part of actually making the knife? Isn't the HTing, machining, grinding, polishing, QA/QCing, ensuring all the little details are what actually make a knife expensive, regardless if it's custom or production.
If we're going off your original point, not all custom makers HRC test every individual blade or give a card with the blade's HRC to the tenth decimal point. Additionally, you have companies like Rockstead, which was previously mentioned, that is a
production company (a high-end one, at that) that HRC tests every single blade and gives you the number. While Rocksteads are expensive, I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that the HRC testing is not a major factor to the end cost. Which means, production companies
can HRC test every blade. The testing of the HRC for a sprint run would actually be easier to do since the volume would be relatively low compared to everything else that would be produced by a manufacturer.
That's why I made the statement that certain
high-end production companies ought to HRC test their blades. They likely already have the resources and the price of their knives are already at a point that I don't think people who buy the knives would care if the price went up a little more. Batch testing is usually good enough for a production company.
I use the ancient Omani khanjar method which is accurate to 0.5 HRC, you flick the blade with your index finger of your right hand and listen to the ring, and frequency, then you lick the blade and taste the hardness and chemical composition. A guy tried to sell me a 7 ring royal khanjar at the local market, he told me the edge is very hard, over 60 HRC, I gave it a lick and told him not to BS me, it was clearly only 57 HRC, I could taste the softness.
How does one acquire this power?
