Geometry and proper sharpening vs steel quality

Cliff Stamp

BANNED
Joined
Oct 5, 1998
Messages
17,562
I had collected a few tension bars to cut up, when I wondered about use as a knife steel. This is a low carbon, unhardened steel, pretty soft, you can bend it readily by hand even though it it a quarter of an inch thick. So as an extreme low end example, I ground a knife blade (~three inches) on one end of the bar. The steel was easily machined, I shaped the basic profile with a 4.5" angle grinder (burning it black intentionally), then refined the bevels and sharpened with a bastard file.

The edge aggression was high, the knife (still attached to the bar) easily cut through fabric (an old sneaker). It was then used for some hacking and grass, weeds and miscellaneous vegetation. The edge was fine, no damage and still aggressive after a few dozen swings. It was then used to cut at some Alders, small woody vegetation, a half an inch thick and under. It easily hacked through the sticks. A piece was then placed on top of a 4x4, and then diced up into sections, trimming off the secondary growth and then moving down the trunk. The edge was still aggressive, no excessive blunting.

The pseudo-spear was then stabbed into the 4x4 a half a dozen times, no damage. It could also break pieces out of the wood on shallow stabs, but on a deep stab (half an inch), the blade bent readily. It worked hardened in that region, as attempting to restore the blade by reverse prying would just bend it in another place. It was restored to semi-straight by beating on it with a hammer. It was then used to split some scrap and clear sticks, which it handled easily, using a framing hammer as a mallet. However during an attempt to split a knotty piece (small stick under three inches), the blade actually bent down under the impacts of the hammer - the split was aborted.

The bevels were then cleaned up with a one inch belt sander, the basic geometry was not altered, just removed the dips from uneven grinding. The edge was also a bit wavy because of all the prying. Checking the edge under magnification revealed a heavy micro-serrated edge, just as would be obtained on a high quality cutlery steel. The edge also scraped shaved a little, and would smoothly slice straight down into a sheet of newsprint. The profile was full convex, very close to flat, no secondary edge bevel, curvature close to the edge (0.024" thick) was 12 degrees per side.

Checking the edge on 3/8" hemp, with a two inch draw, the blade took 30 lbs to make a complete cut. I was a bit rusty not having done this in a while, so a more reasonable estimate would be 25-30 lbs. Considering the waves in the edge, with a clean grind 20-25 lbs should be possible. Anyway, after 62 cuts through the hemp the knife was taking 38-42 lbs, and could no longer slice the newsprint well, was tearing it heavily. Checking the edge under magnification, all the secondary micro-serrations had worn away, but the primary teeth were still visible, and aggression could still be felt on the hemp rope cutting, at least another round (64 cuts) were easily possible before the slipping would become excessive.

For reference, the SOG SEAL with a 600 grit DMT finish took about 40 lbs to make the first cuts, and after only 14 slices on the hemp the force required exceeded 50 lbs. The tension bar knife thus showed much better cutting efficieny and edge lifetime. This shows quite clearly the massive influence that geometry and grit choice for sharpening can make on cutting efficient and edge holding.

The tension bar knife was later sharpened to a high polish using waterstones and finishing with CrO, and it easily shaved and push cut newsprint (it would catch on two sections as I was lazy and didn't reset the edge completely), an argument against another myth about sharpness being a sign of quality.

To clarify, the above isn't an arguement that geometry and proper sharpening are more important that steel quality. They are all important, however it should illustrate clearly that ignoring even one of the aspects can lead to a very poor performance tool, even if the other aspects are very high.

-Cliff
 
Cliff,

I agree, edge geometry and the properties of the steel go hand in hand. You may have more skill at controlling your steel or shaping your blades, but performance will be limited by the lesser of the two. With extremely strong steel you may still be able to hammer through materials without damage, but it's the edge geometry that makes your knife an efficient tool. In my mind, ergonomics probably plays the next most important role. It would be hard to get the full potential out of the knife if it isn't easy to hold and exert great pressure without feeling any discomfort.

-Jose
 
Very much so yes, it makes little difference in a practical sense if a knife is a very efficient cutting tool from the point of view of how much force is required, if it is very uncomfortable or unstable in hand.

-Cliff
 
Very interesting test Cliff, thanks for sharing. Not at all the results I expected when I read your test parameters.
 
So Cliff, I am understanding and in agreement that edge geometry and steel work together. What you are cutting and ergonomics also play a huge role. With all that in mind, what would you consider the best knife for carving hardwoods (cherry, walnut, etc.) without the use of a striking mallet, just hand strength.
 
Cliff,

If I understand you correctly, the included angle on the blade you created was 24 degrees and had a convex grind, but was very close to being flat. As all of us, I am interested in getting my knives as sharp as possible, and keeping them that way. I do not have a slack belt grinder, so I can’t grind my knives with a convex edge. I have tried using the mouse pad and automotive sandpaper trick, but it seems to me that the paper has lost its bite after just a few strokes. This being the case, I fall back on using a Lansky system to bevel my edges and them finish using ceramic sticks for the final edge. I have two questions, is there significant difference between a convex edge and a flat beveled edge and also do you have any other suggestions for creating a true convex edge on a blade, short of buying a slack belt grinder? Thanks.
 
Roadrunner :

Not at all the results I expected when I read your test perameters.

I expected it to be somewhat functional as I know a custom knifemaker (Muhamad Irwan) who has made knives out of mild steel. We discussed it a few years back and he had done all of the above types of cutting. Some things I am still curious about, such as can it be used for even slight boning work like cutting a chicken up for stock. I would also be curious as to the limits of its use as a chopping blade or machete.

Bobwhite :

So Cliff, I am understanding and in agreement that edge geometry and steel work together.

Yes, Joe has a nice section on this in the lastest Sharpening and Steel FAQS.

... what would you consider the best knife for carving hardwoods (cherry, walnut, etc.) without the use of a striking mallet, just hand strength.

Assuming you are doing finish carving, sharpness is the critical factor as you can't have the blade damage the wood. Most carving knives are honed frequently to keep the surface of the wood highly polished. With that in mind I don't see wear resistance being overly useful, a high hardness is the maximum factor for allowing the thinnest edge and best edge retention. For custom, get a simple steel like 1095 and have it hardened to maximum, 66 HRC. You can get Japanese laminates that are almost this hard, 62 / 64 HRC, with similar steels. Ergonomics need to be matched to hand particulars.

Richard Sommer :

If I understand you correctly, the included angle on the blade you created was 24 degrees and had a convex grind, but was very close to being flat.

Yes towards the edge the curvature deepened a little so it was about 12 degrees per side, and towards the start of the grind it went down to 8-10. You can't see any secondary bevel by eye, but if you use a ruler along the primary bevel you can see a hint of curvature.

I do not have a slack belt grinder, so I can~Rt grind my knives with a convex edge.

You can use the same belts freehand :

http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=208093

It is *REALLY* slow compared to the sander. The one inch sanders are actually cheap, ~$75 Canadian. These easily handle the occasional edge reprofile, I have even fully convex ground (spine to edge) a few blades on mine. It is still going strong after several years and a lot of grinding.

I have tried using the mouse pad and automotive sandpaper trick, but it seems to me that the paper has lost its bite after just a few strokes.

It will fill up quickly and needs to be cleaned, if used dry you can usually just blow it off. It should not load up when wet. The paper could be bad however, drop me an email with your address and I'll send you a piece of SiC on Mylar from Lee Valley you can use for comparison.

I have two questions, is there significant difference between a convex edge and a flat beveled edge ...

Convex edges will distribute impacts much better than flat bevels which can focus the load right on the edge, they also wedge less, both of these are however usually only of functional benefit on heavier chopping blades. The main advantage of a convex grind is that it allows for the edge to be slightly more obtuse which gains a massive amount of strength with little loss in cutting ability. You can get the same performance with v-grinds using a double bevel.

... any other suggestions for creating a true convex edge on a blade, short of buying a slack belt grinder?

You can actually do it by hand with a normal benchstone. You arc the hone over the blade, or blade over the hone. It sounds completely unrealistic as it would appear to demand a really high amount of skill, however after trying it I found it to much easier than I expected.

-Cliff
 
Cliff, thanks for the advise. I had not thought of a simple 1” belt sander. I had only considered the more serious belt grinders, which I cannot afford or justify. One other question, seeing that hardness is one of the critical factors, (you mentioned above using 1095 with a hardness of 66 for carving wood) what would you think about one of the high speed steels (M42 or T15) hardened to 67 or 68? Would there be any advantage in using HSS over 1095? It would definitely be a challenge to sharpen, but the edge will not roll easily.
 
Yes you can get higher with various HSS steels, up to ~72 HRC at maximum. Comparing 72 HRC with a very high carbide content to 1095 at 66 HRC, would probably favor the HSS significantly as it has both a hardness and very large wear resistance advantage.

However in most cutting where edge roll is the dominant factor, as it the case in the above, comparing M2 at 66 HRC with 1095 at the same hardness, I would not bet on M2 being that much more superior. Though if the cutting was expanded to more abrasive materials the HSS blade would jump ahead readily.

Of course if you can get the HSS blade for the same price or similar, get it over the 1095 one. HSS's in general though are more expensive, much harder to machine, and much less forgiving on heat treatment.

The one inch belt sanders are more than enough to modify knives, but not really built to take fully grinding them, I would assume they would break down before long. They would also be *very* slow due to the more narrow belt, and not able to take very heavy torque.

-Cliff
 
Using the knife with the high polish from the fine ceramic rod (22 degree microbevel, not wide enough to be visible by eye), a chicken was separated. First the legs and wings were removed and disjointed. The blade cut through the flesh and fat easily, no slippage. The tendons and other connective tissues were also easily cut, as well the breasts were removed. The knife was then used to trim off any loose meat from the rest of the chicken.

On an amusing note the blade was more effective than a recent custom knife due to its smaller size and weight making it easier to control. The cutting ability was fine, soft materials like this only require sharpness, and the blade was shaving sharp. No loss of aggression was noted after the cutting was performed, and much more was done that necessary to actually prepare the chicken, the breasts were cut into chunks and so on.

The rest of the chicken was then broken up into fist size pieces breaking the joints. The knife was then used to cut through the bones reducing the pieces to a couple of inches or less for stock. At first just a few small rib bones were cut, but when that did no damage the cutting progressed to cutting right through the spine, across on a slant, and then ot the heavier bones. Some were that hard to cut that they required body weight pressure on the blade and a back and forth rocking motion to shear through the bones, about six times or so.

Cleaning the knife, the edge was free of damage, not even a glint under the light. Checking the shaving abilility, it would scrape a few hairs on one side, none on the other. However after two passes per side on a smooth steel, the blade was sharper than when I finished on the ceramic rod, so little or no steel was worn away from the bone contacts. It should be noted that the stock cutting also didn't actually require as much bone cutting as was performed, it was done just to examine the behavior of the knife.

So as a kitchen knife, it will easily handle extended cutting on meats, and even significant bone contacts with damage or excessive blunting, and is easily restored with a couple of passes on a steel or fine ceramic. Next is to try it out on some vegetables, peeling potatoes will probably be the hardest task.

As a side issue, I had done such cutting on chickens before and thought it was a decent toughness test for kitchen knives, considering that this knife can do it fine with a 12 degree edge, this doesn't seem to be a reasonable standard any more. This was a small chicken, less than three pounds, maybe a full size turkey or even a largish chicken would be a better standard. Thoughts?

-Cliff
 
Cliff:

When you sharpened the knife w/ a bastard file, did you form a burr? If so, did you remove it and how? Also, can you address the same questions for sharpening w/a belt sander?
 
I agree, a bigger chicken or a turkey would be quite a bit tougher on the edge. There isn't a whole lot to bird bones anyway, but turkeys are built a lot stouter than chickens, especially the big ones. So far though, it sounds like you've got quite a blade. Maybe you should market this idea ;) .
 
Cliff, fascinating thread. I new edge geometry was important, but I didn’t realize how much difference it really made. All of my using knives currently are flat ground with flat secondary bevels on them, but after reading this thread and thinking about what happens, I have decided to put a convex edge on one of my knives. When you sharpen your blades, does it seem to matter how much “slack” is in your belt. Also, it seems that a convex edge would be a constantly changing radius, is this true? I will try your trick of using a belt tied to a fixed object at each end with slack in the middle, unless you have a better suggestion. I have also read here on Blade Forums where a knife maker suggested using a piece of cardboard to sharpen a convex ground blade by drawing the blade backward. I know that paper and cardboard are abrasive, but it would seem to me that your blade would need to be reasonably sharp for this to accomplish anything. What are your thoughts. Thanks again for all of your efforts and information.

Richard
 
Elwin, a burr did form with the file very readily as I recall. It was cut off by cutting into the edge with a few light strokes with the file and then returning to honding from spine to edge. This works with most burrs, it is critical to use edge-into honing.

On the belt sander the edge was fairly crisp under magnification, it was not buffing or polished. I have found that this gives the best edge in terms of aggression. The blade is on the sander turned up, so that the honing is edge-into which is not prone to burr formation.

Roadrunner :

I agree, a bigger chicken or a turkey would be quite a bit tougher on the edge. There isn't a whole lot to bird bones anyway, but turkeys are built a lot stouter than chickens, especially the big ones.

Yes, regardless of how "fair" a test it is, it would be useful to bound the performance limits. In general though few "kitchen" knives out side of cleavers are designed to hack through large turkey bones.

This has also made me *very* curious about the OK-45 ceramic from Kyocera and the Japanese utility knife, both I have never used for bone cutting, but if a knife made out of a tension bar can do it, with a 12 degree edge?

I also intend to use it for extened wood whittling, would be it functional for example for starting a fire, making some scrapings and kindling. As a fairly extreme test of edge holding, I'll try it one on some mats or used carpet or similar.

It would be really amusing if it was anyway functional at these tasks.

So far though, it sounds like you've got quite a blade. Maybe you should market this idea

Yes, I just need slap on a tanto point, to paint it black, drill a few "speed holes" in the handle, and put it in a Kydex sheath.

Maybe I can market it to Cold Steel and then they can use "deep cryo" on it to maximize the performance like they did with AISI 420.

It will be the start of a new line of knives, I think I'll call them "Bog Mice". This particular blade will be the utility version which I will call the "Screaming Shrew".

I'll see if I can't get a picture up this weekend. The fit and finish is awesome. At the end of the grip where it was hacked off the bar it is still left jagged.

Richard :

I new edge geometry was important, but I didn~Rt realize how much
difference it really made.

The biggest proponents of this aspects were Mike Swaim and Alvin Johnson. Many years ago on rec.knives (long before Bladeforums), where knife performance was sold based purely on the steel, both of those guys were exclaiming the virtues of edge geometry and proper sharpening.

Mike did a lot of work with coarse edges after working in a fish plant, and Alvin is a knife maker who specializes in highly efficient cutting tools. Alvin was also one of the only guys to argue for hardness being more important than wear resistance, and used very high hardness levels on on his knives , 64-66 HRC.

Joe Talmadge greatly extended these ideas doing specific comparisons on knives and giving performance estimates for the change in cutting ability after an edge reprofile and sharpening to a more coarse grit. It was really amazing, and he saw performance increase of hundreds of percent on slicing rope for example.


When you sharpen your blades, does it seem to matter how much slack is in your belt.

Yes, the amount of give is what controls the amount of the curvature.

Also, it seems that a convex edge would be a constantly changing radius, is this true?

Yes, this is an example of an actual full convex profile :

http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/images/blade_profile_parrell.gif

... a knife maker suggested using a piece of cardboard to sharpen a convex ground blade by drawing the blade backward.

This will do little or anything. Try to polish a scratch out with a piece of cardboard, it will take a *long* time. Load the cardboard with CrO or similar.

-Cliff
 
How safe, then, would it be to assume that bad knife with a good handle can eventually be turned into a good knife?
 
Thom,

Cliff has done a good job illustrating the importance of edge geometry, but let's not forget that the steel plays an important role as well. Shaping the blade is only one of many aspects of knifemaking that need to be mastered. Assuming the maker has a good understanding of the steel he's working with, and a proper heat treating method, but has not improved his skill at grinding, then reprofiling the blade would almost certainly improve it. That is of course if the blade was originally left thick enough to allow this and that enough of the edge was hardened.

-Jose
 
Thanks, Jose. I make all kinds of assumptions and like knowing when they're not safe. Makes life less painful when I know my mental laziness is setting a self-made trap.

Of course, I think it would be the rare person who knows his or her steel inside and out, but doesn't shape the blade to get the most out of that steel. Mass-produced knives can sometimes be another story as the buyers may prefer a certain grind or thickness of edge that knifeknuts and folks who use out of necessity may find incongruent with their needs.

Thanks again.
 
Very interesting cliff. I recall that inexpensive knives before the industrial revolution often were of very marginal steel, iron really, or "steely iron" as I have read. In other words, iron barely at the threshold of hardenability. A plain iron knife can be a keen slicer, but keep a butchers steel handy.
 
Go for it Cliff, I'm sure Cold Steel would be overjoyed. Funny stuff. I really would like to see a picture though, let us know when you get one up. This just makes me want a grinder that much more. Too bad I don't have a garage to put it in, I'm afraid setting up a toolshop in the barracks might annoy my roommate so I can't put one in here.
 
Further kitchen use :

The knife was used to make a salad, cutting up two fresh mushrooms, 1/4 of a cucumber, three green onions, some chicken pieces, a medium tomato, and a stalk of celery. I used a Japanese styled utility knife for a reference :

http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/knives/japanese_utility_LV.html

On the mushrooms, the tension bar knife was just as capable, no advantage to the Japanese knife as both were razor sharp and mushrooms are soft so they are not influenced significantly by blade geometry as they can't generate binding forces, similar for the green onions and chicken pieces. The tomato was also cleanly cut by the mild steel blade, but it was too thick to make thin slices so the Japanese knife was tagged in. On the celery the thickness of the tension bar knife could again be felt as the celery was rigid enough to induce enough wedging to be readily noticed, of course no big fatigue drain. However if I had to cut up a bad of rhubarb, I would definately want a thinner blade. No difference in sharpness after the cutting.

Further wood cutting :

Curious about the overall scope of work, the knife was used to hack down an alder, about one inch thick. The stick was bend with my left hand and then given a few pops with the knife to cut through the base, which it did readily. The knife then easily lopped off the branches with wrist flicks, removed the bark from the wood, and pointed the end, which was then cracked off and repointed (about 100 slices for the pointing in total). A 1.5" thick piece of seasoned pine (two years old), was then pointed, knots were removed by cutting straight down to break them up and then chiseling them straight off. About fifty cuts were made to shape the point, more force here than on the Alders to try to find the performance limits. The knife was less than 100% on shaving, but could still pop down dandelions, however could not cut individual stalks of grass. A couple of passes on a smooth steel and it was back to 100%.

The knife was later used (after a couple of passes on the fine ceramic rod to reset the edge) to baton through the same piece of seasoned pine. At first low force was used (baton was a 18 oz ball pien hammer), but towards the end deep cuts were being made, so much so that spine was getting flattened, and the piece of wood broke when the first cut was attempted on the back side after cutting half way through on the front. Moving on, the knife was used to cut through a 6x6, pressure treated, seasoned for a few years, very dense. Well actually, after batoning for about five minutes, and cutting a notch two inches deep and four inches wide through one corner, it became obvious that this wasn't an overly difficult task, though time consuming. However my hand was begining to not appreciate having to hold onto a quarter inch piece of steel with a jagged end which was being smashed with a hammer. The edge while blunted, was free of visible damage, and nothing could be felt, it could also still pop the dandelions, though more care was needed. The knife needed 10 passes per side on the ceramic rod to be restored to 100%.

Back to the kitchen :

The knife was used to cut up a couple of turnip slices into small strips, and then peel six potatoes, unwashed. it handled well for the potato peeling, but was too thick for the turnip slices. After the cutting it was still shaving sharp, no real effect on the edge.

Back to more wood work :

On the piece of seasoned wood earlier batoned in half, the knife was used to make 1 tsp of fine scrapings for firestarting. The edge suffered no damage and was restored to shaving with a couple of passes on a smooth steel. Some hairs were missed however, and so a couple of passes on the ceramic rod were used to set it back to 100% shaving.

The next few things I have planned to do are try and cut down Alders big enough to frame out a shelter, so a few inches thick, resharpen the edge with the 100 grit AO belt and repeat the hemp cutting to refine the performance estiamtes, and try cutting some more abrasive materials like cardboard and such.

Fox :

A plain iron knife can be a keen slicer, but keep a butchers steel
handy.

I never even considered that, I should buy a piece of the lowest alloy mild steel, or just pure iron. Maybe even some Al alloys.

thombrogan :

I think it would be the rare person who knows his or her steel inside and out, but doesn't shape the blade to get the most out of that steel.

This isn't an absolute. Their idea of high performance might be massively different than yours, see the recent Fowler thread for a rather striking example of such a difference of opinion. A maker also has to be experienced in the type of cutting to know how to make a blade to do that well. I would not count on high grade steel implying anything about geometry optomization.

There is also a tremendous amount of hype in the industry about the effect of steel quality (base composition, manufacturing and heat treatement) on the performance of a knife which skews the geometry aspect to the far side. Due to the work of people like Mike Swaim, Joe Talmadge and Alvin Johnson, many of the myths have been overturned to some extent on the forums, but off line is a different matter.

Go back to 1998 and check the lists and usenet and see just how much performance was pushed purely on the basis of steel quality, geometry was almost ignored, especially edges which were rarely if ever mentioned. Even now you can still see many myths being repeated such as the common one that you can ignore hardness in regards to edge retention. In reality this is the dominant factor in cutting many types of materials.


thombrogan :

How safe, then, would it be to assume that bad knife with a good handle can eventually be turned into a good knife?

I started off wondering just how badly a mild steel knife would fail to function as I had seen makers saying it wasn't even a useful point to practive on so I assumed one of two cuts into wood and it was dead blunt. I intended to work up trying a few alloys setting some usable limits. However it turned out that the simple mild steel knife was easily capable of handing tasks which are often used to promote the higher end knives.

I myself used chicken bone cutting as a entry standard for toughness mainly as I assumed that it was some kind of decent standard simply as people warned against it. It turned out to be just another example of more promotion than fact. Of course any knife has to be able to handle all of the above, with absolute ease, and even then that only puts you at the level of performance of a knife ground out of mild steel - this isn't a huge standard to aspire to of course.

If I get some time this week I think I am going to try and cut a thinner one, say 1/8, but maybe more likely 3/16", and see if at that thickness it has the necessary stiffness to still enable it to whittle woods and such.

Jose :

the steel plays an important role as well

Geometry defines the limits of cutting performance, steel defines the limits of functional geomtry. User skill level and physical ability comes strongly into play on the latter. During the above wood cutting, I was attempting to set lower bounds on the scope of work, how far could the blade be pushed with care.

If the blade was used in less familar hands, with more force, it could have easily be buckeled in the baton work, or prying loose chips. In any case, I would not recommend using this knife in a "survival" situation, as it would not be very dependable if a high stress situation where a lapse in technique could easily leave it very bent, though unbroken.

-Cliff
 
Back
Top