Gerber Fatty

Joined
Feb 15, 2003
Messages
2,575
Just got this because I kind of like its looks......

Fatty1.jpg

Fatty2U.jpg

No... the pictures are not distorted - that's why this time I also included a ruler at right angles as well as the grid paper background.

I like the very broad blade - Gerber does not seem to spec the steel - Gerber's page on the Fatty - I have read elsewhere it's 440A.

It is also thicker than most would expect -
FattyBk.jpg


It is a pretty chubby knife - actually much more substantial -
FattyCls.jpg


The handle material has a kind of hard rubbery feel - Gerber calls the material "SoftGrip" - and it does feels nice in the hand.

The knife feels much bigger in the hand and clipped to the pocket than the pictures might suggest.

The grippy/tacky aspect does present a slight problem for me -
the clip becomes harder to use -
I have tried adjusting the tension of the clip - but it's the handle material that tends to grip to the pocket making it harder to insert easily. I have to hold the edge of my pocket so that I can clip the knife without danger of ripping my pocket.

Withdrawal requires a bit of conscious effort too.

The obvious point of interest for me was the very broad "fat" blade
FattyBladeChip.jpg

this makes the knife pretty substantial and tough.

Mine came with a very slight chip in the blade at the red arrow - it hardly shows in the photo which is already 1.56x life-size.

I have read elsewhere some people felt the blade was not very sharp out of the box - I can assure that my sample of one was really sharp - slicing paper really well.

I have since touched it up using fine-grain crock-sticks to minimize the chip (it's still barely there) and am impressed with the cutting ability.......
I think it's probably due to the flat ground, wide (fat) blade -
seems to cut through corrugated cardboard real well.

The action on mine is good - the lock up is about as good as I'd expect from a lockback - there is no side-to-side play - there is only just a perceptible movement up-down in-line with the opening/closing of the blade - which is pretty good for a lockback.

There is no mid-dent on the tang which Gerber used to be famous for - and because Gerber have maximized the cutting edge of the short 2.28" blade for the Fatty - there is no separate heel/tang on the blade - I needed more care closing one-handed. I normally hold the knife so the blade can fall under gravity when unlatched - however this means the edge will swing toward my middle finger that's across the opening - whereas other lockbacks the heel will contact my finger.....

So now I hold the knife blade face horizontal (ie: so the blade cannot fall under gravity) and use my index finger to nudge the blade when it's unlatched - then change hand position (getting fingers out of the way) to fully close the knife.....

I didn't pay that much for the knife - including shipping it was $13.98 ..... from here - I have also seen it elsewhere on eBay for as low as $12.99 shipped.

--
Vincent
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2006
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2005
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2004
http://clik.to/UnknownVincent
 
Nice writeup, interesting design though I would question the use of a stout/strong blade with such a small handle.

-Cliff
 
Nice writeup, interesting design though I would question the use of a stout/strong blade with such a small handle.

The images are deceptive since the broad fat blade is out of proportion to the rest of the knife -

I also thought from the pictures I saw before I bought the knife that it was going to be "small" - it isn't that small - just broad and fat -
the handle is actually 3 5/8" long - which is longer than my EDC SAK -
handle is also wider and pretty thick as I tried to show -
so it is actually a handful for me,
although I'd still call it "compact" - but definitely not "small"......

(sounds nitpicky/pedantic - but it's actually quite an important point as Cliff was trying to point out - it's silly to have strong tough blade if the handle is too small to extert any reasonable force with it....)

Hopefully these new pics show its size in context -
FattyHnd1.jpg
FattyHnd.jpg


FattyClsHnd.jpg


--
Vincent
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2006
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2005
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2004
http://clik.to/UnknownVincent
 
Thanks for the additional pictures, excellent as always. Any thoughts on the handle strength around the pivot. Do you think it has the necessary ability to make the blade thickness/width functional?

-Cliff
 
I bought one of those and gave it to my father. Don't let the listed specs mislead you, it is a handful and seems very sturdy. In fact, one of the reasons I gave it away is because it felt too big for me. I like small knives I can slip into my pockets but this felt huge.
 
Any thoughts on the handle strength around the pivot. Do you think it has the necessary ability to make the blade thickness/width functional?

The pivot looks "over-engineered" pretty big heads for such a short knife -
the tang is big for a compact knife too - since the blade is overly broad/wide the tang is in proportion.

I'm reticent to do destructive testing on one of my own knives -
but the overall feel (and looks) are very sturdy -
most things seem and feel "oversized" -
I know that sounds like a contradiction for a seemingly compact knife.

For example the reason why the knife handle fills my hand -
is because of the oversized girth/circumferance -
it measures 3.25" -
compare this with about 2.6" of a Buck 112 Ranger (substantial handle) -
or a Benchmade 710 Axis at about 2.75".....

As stevekt posted -

Don't let the listed specs mislead you, it is a handful and seems very sturdy. In fact, one of the reasons I gave it away is because it felt too big for me. I like small knives I can slip into my pockets but this felt huge.
Thanks steve, that was very well put.

The Fatty is deceptively "big" -
FattySz.jpg

the handle is much wider than normal

FattyThk2.jpg

It is also pretty thick - as thick as a Buck 112 Ranger (or a two layered SAK) - and that's not even counting the clip......

I like the Fatty as I "palm" the handle which makes me feel more secure in knowing it's unlikely my hand will ever slip on to the blade when I am pushing hard.....

The Fatty is a compact knife that feels BIG -
and by my take on the way it's designed and constructed -
I am hoping it acts BIG too.......

--
Vincent
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2006
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2005
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2004
http://clik.to/UnknownVincent
 
My local Wal-Mart had one on clearance this week for just $9.00, it was teh 50/50 half serrated edge, which I don't like so I passed on it, but the knife itself did seem well built.

Nice review!
 
My local Wal-Mart had one on clearance this week for just $9.00, it was teh 50/50 half serrated edge, which I don't like so I passed on it, but the knife itself did seem well built.

Yes, maybe 3-4 weeks ago I noticed my local WalMart marked their display photo of the partially serrated Gerber Fatty as no longer available (as well as other Gerbers and some other brands) - but they never went on sale - just cleared the stock -

Perhaps that's why there are now so many on eBay and some at pretty low prices - when I saw mine at just under $14 shipped I thought it was "cheap" - now I see BuyItNows at $13 delivered and some with opening bids of $0.01.

--
Vincent
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2006
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2005
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2004
http://clik.to/UnknownVincent
 
I'm reticent to do destructive testing one my own knives ...

Wasn't suggesting that, just a comment from inspection/experience. Thanks for the details. It is nice to see come commentary on the more inexpensive knives.

-Cliff
 
I am facinated by this "Little Big" knife scenario (syndrome? :p)

Here's a size comparison with those two other well known knives open -
FattyOpnSz.jpg


Somehow the Gerber Fatty still manages to appear kind of "small" - I think, mainly due to its shortness.

But here's that "Little-Big" thing -
I think most would consider the Buck 112 Ranger a good mid-sized and substantial knife -
and the Fatty in the pic above looks significantly shorter
(if not "smaller").....

BUT
FattyBladeSz.jpg

looks like the effective cutting length of the Fatty's blade is about the same as the Buck 112 Ranger?

--
Vincent
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2006
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2005
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2004
http://clik.to/UnknownVincent
 
looks like the effective cutting length of the Fatty's blade is about the same as the Buck 112 Ranger?

For some types of cutting, for others the fact that a lot of the edge is tip curvature could be a drawback. As well for a lot of uses of small knives, a really pointy tip tends to be of benefit. However I can see where a stouter knife would be of use, assuming the handle/pivot matches the strength of the blade.

-Cliff
 
For some types of cutting, for others the fact that a lot of the edge is tip curvature could be a drawback. As well for a lot of uses of small knives, a really pointy tip tends to be of benefit. However I can see where a stouter knife would be of use, assuming the handle/pivot matches the strength of the blade.

I agree wholeheartedly - that's why the CRKT Ichi (manual version) is part of my EDC -
Fatty_Ichi.jpg

despite the fact the CRKT Ichi blade is none-other than 420J2....
The much pointier tip is both an advantage and disadvantage - sometimes I find it too "pointy" as it tends to catch on the material I am cutting.

But the Gerber Fatty is almost the other end of the spectrum with a pretty curved point and wide big belly (fatty?) - so to me the blade appears very stout - and rest of the oversized parts of the knife seem to reflect this stoutness.

I think this may simply be a case of actually handling the knife to see what I am (and stevekt) are getting at -
the knife for such a shorty - feels HUGE.
and that is partly why I got it it's a compact knife but with BIG knife attributes - and I think that includes stout/toughness.....

I EDC the CRKT Ichi for its size, and Gerber Fatty is WAY too big -
despite appearing to be compact and the same length......

--
Vincent
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2006
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2005
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2004
http://clik.to/UnknownVincent
 
I bought two Fatty's and one had an identical nick straight out of the box, just like yours. I wonder if it's common?
 
Very nice and different from anything I have. I just sent a pic to the wife as a stocking stuffer suggestion.

tjg
 
I bought two Fatty's and one had an identical nick straight out of the box, just like yours. I wonder if it's common?

Interesting.... thanks for the report.

I wonder now if something in the manufacturing process chips these blades there? Actually I also found another flat nearer the heel too.

--------------------------------
Anyway one of the main things I wanted to do with such a broad wide blade was to convex the edge.

Being the type who does not like to marr the finish of the blade I used tape to protect the finish - but thin enough not to prevent me from almost laying the blade face flat on my (diamond, fine grit) stone -

FattyTaped1.jpg
FattyTaped2.jpg


I then just ground away to get rid of the shoulder/corner between the cutting edge and the blade face -
then later using a rolling motion to make the virtually zero bevel as convex as I could.

Finished lightly on crock-sticks for the final edge, and stropped on leather then cardboard.........
FattyConv4.jpg
FattyConv3.jpg


I'll probably work on the blade even more to try to blend the edge into the face - but this is OK for me for now, as I cannot really feel any discontinuity between the blade face and cutting edge - and the transition from blade face to edge does feel smooth to me -
and obviously doing this, has got rid of the chip and that flat on the edge.......

--
Vincent
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2006
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2005
http://clik.to/UnknownVT2004
http://clik.to/UnknownVincent
 
I almost got one of these but read another thread stating the blade peeks out the bottom when closed.....Is this true?
 
Hmmmn, I was thinking of getting one, but opted not too, it looks like I might have to now.
 
How does it compare to the Boker Subcom? Anybody have both?
 
My Fatty is pretty hard to open either with the thumb stud or with two hands. Any suggestions on how to loosen it up? I tried loosening the screw that the blade pivots on (with the star shaped hole in the pics above) but it was still tight.
 
Back
Top