Glock problems.

Send that gun back! I have owned many many glocks , and still own a few ;) I can't count the rounds I've put through them, but I can tell you how many issues I've had, 1 and it was on reloads, when I went back to regular ammo , the gun performed and continues to perform flawlessly, don't let this incident shy you away from glocks, they are great handguns, you just have one with some issues.
 
Usually. I've never heard nor have I ever had this problem with Glocks. 1911's though, this is normal. ;) Send it back. It's a lemon.

I work in a gun store. I hear about Glock perfection all the damn time. Same people who say revolvers never break.

I've seen glocks light strike, failure to feed, failure to eject, blow up, you name it.

Guns are man made, they can and will screw up. I'm just glad some people have the courage to post my glock won't work threads.
 
Thanks guys. Im sure I was not limp wristing it as I have heard this brings up issues. I took it back to the dealer I purchased it from and when they shot it they were surprised to find everything I said was true. They have never seen a pistol that ejected rounds so violently back to your face before. They are replacing the spring for me and are going to try some things to see if they can fix it. I really do not want to send this gun back but I guess we get to find out if I have to tonight. Not too happy about spending money on a gun that has so many issues right out of the box...Honestly I feel like they should have done a recall and fixed the issues if they were so common.
 
I work in a gun store. I hear about Glock perfection all the damn time. Same people who say revolvers never break.

I've seen glocks light strike, failure to feed, failure to eject, blow up, you name it.

Guns are man made, they can and will screw up. I'm just glad some people have the courage to post my glock won't work threads.

My post was a bit of 1911 vs glock humor. :D
 
My STI has been very good to me and has given me none of the issues I have experienced with Glocks...I have seen Kimbers have problems though.
Note: I am not trying to start a brand war. It is very easy to get annoyed as a consumer to buy something that is toted as ultra-reliable and have it fail right out of box.
 
I don't know what spring they're referring to, but it's not a spring issue.
If you want to learn more about it, take the time to go to Glocktalk & search the dozens of PAGES of posts on the issue.

If it's recognized as a serious problem by seriously dedicated Glockers, and it is, you can assume the issue is very real.
I doubt your local dealer will be able to fix the pistol, it needs to go back to Glock.
Even then, Glock has replaced entire pistols when they couldn't correct the problem.
Percentages run about 90/10 it'll have to go back to them.

Glock, being producers of "perfection", does not do recalls.
They do "upgrades".

And, take nothing I say here as bashing Glocks. I've carried them in uniform & out, and currently own several.
The point of my participation in this thread is to address the brass-to-the-face issue, not to knock the brand.
Denis
 
I work in a gun store. I hear about Glock perfection all the damn time. Same people who say revolvers never break.

I've seen glocks light strike, failure to feed, failure to eject, blow up, you name it.

Guns are man made, they can and will screw up. I'm just glad some people have the courage to post my glock won't work threads.

I respect your input as well, I've been a glock carrier for years , like I said I've owned Gah I couldn't tell you all the models ,and still own quite a few, Sure anything man made is going to have issues, but I picked a handgun based on it's reputation back when I bought my first one. I was told "Well you can't beat the ole .357 S&W if the gun doesn't fire you just pull the trigger again it will never fail you, but if you have to get a semi auto you can't beat a glock, followed by a sales pitch of how most cops carry glocks " lol, same thing you just said about revolvers. The reason I have brand loyalty to glock is based on my experiences, and Maybe I just got lucky with the ones I've owned or still own. I will say this, a friend of mine owns a gun store and I have had the privilege of owning, and or testing A LOT of handguns, and if the gun didn't handle the way that I like or if it had any issues I just trade the gun in. I will say that IMHO there are few handguns that I have handled that I trust as much as a glock, some that I trust just as much as glock are the m&p 9 by smith and wesson, that one has had a nice amount of rounds though it , without any hiccups. The springfield XDM 40 may replace my glocks one day, but after owning and shooting glocks for years it's hard to get away from "old faithful". I do agree with your post about guns though, the point of me posting was like i said I have had the privilege of getting to test out, and or own A LOT of handguns, I have really been surprised at what guns performed flawlessly , and what guns couldn't go a full magazine without having a FTF or a FTE , lightstrikes (which I will say the first m&p I tried loved to do FWIW). Bottom line though your post is correct, the human error is always going to be there. :thumbup: good post. Going to add this as well my buddy has been to the glock armorer school or class or whatever it is (he's certified to work on the guns):) , Anyway he has always told me to leave the guns alone , meaning leave them stock, that when you start modifying the guns, that is when you may start having problems, Now if the gun is a range queen then he'll do what you want, but for a SD handgun, and I'm sure this goes for all models he can work on , the only thing he will do is lighten the trigger up for you. Even then glock comes with a 5.5 lbs trigger, He will only take it down to 3.5lbs . Whew that was long winded my apologies.
 
Last edited:
In the past, Glocks had a well-deserved reputation for reliability.

The BTTF issue appears to center around the re-design of more recent extractors.
Glock is now using MIM extractors, and the design itself is different from the one that Glock built its rep on.
Denis
 
In the past, Glocks had a well-deserved reputation for reliability.

The BTTF issue appears to center around the re-design of more recent extractors.
Glock is now using MIM extractors, and the design itself is different from the one that Glock built its rep on.
Denis

I've owned 2 Gen 4's, Had to have one when I saw them so I got a Gen 4 17, but I hate the rough textured frame among other things , so I sold it. I decided to try another Gen 4 so I got the 22, Still hate the rough textured frame, and honestly I don't really carry the gun thanks to the texturing, but I'm trying to warm up to it , It has some features I do like, but nothing that can't be put on a gen 3, (enlarged mag release) is about all I like on the 4's , but all my 3's have those as well as an extended slide stop lever, (which doesn't come on the gen 4), IMO glock just tried to upgrade the gun to keep up with the times, again IMO it should of been more thought out, especially for people who conceal carry (see rough textured frame).
 
Last edited:
Disturbing just put money down on Glock gen 4. The rough texture I can deal with,rub it down with synthetic steel wool. The extractor issue is troubling though. I'd say let Glock take a try at making it right,they do have good customer service.
 
Doesn't happen on ALL new Glocks, and when it does it typically starts to occur about 800-1000 rounds in, according to most reports.
Doing it right off the bat is not a good sign at all.
Denis
 
Back
Top