Recommendation? Gloves for G10 grinding

G10 feels like crap in the hand anyways. I see no reason to have anything to do with it.

I love me some crap ๐Ÿ˜

 
your right G10 has a feel all its own and when finished i dont hate it for some knives others in say no way.all depends on the knife and use just like all other custom works. my next folder will likely be finely sanded adn buffed grey G10 (dress pocket knife) goals are light smooth and gent use didnt want to use black G10 cause i wanted something different (i dont mind a folder calling itself out even when dressed up )
 
I love G10. I can make my most comfortable handles with it. I prefer Suretouch because of the grip the rubber layers give. But whether Suretouch or G10 (or any other material, including carbon fiber), I grind it dry, barehanded, and at high speed, sending dust flying in the shop. As long as I have a respirator I'm good to go. I get the dust all over my hands and clothes. It bothers me not in the slightest, and is easy to wash off completely.
 
G10 is the most true to color and fadeless handle material. It's also reinforced and stronger than stuff like Elforyn, Juma, Corian etc. It grinds, sands and buffs easily. I particularily like finishing it with the 3M sanding pads to Microfine.

Downsides are it feels a little cold and slippery in the hand. And its high density can scew the balance on some fixed blades a little more than micarta.
 
I'll have to look for it, but I've found a study in the past that shows that G10 dust is every bit as dangerous as asbestos dust.

G10 feels like crap in the hand anyways. I see no reason to have anything to do with it.
Both have harmful respiratory effects. Asbestos over time causes asbestosis, which is due to the fibers cutting and the inability of your body to expel them as they act like little barbs. This forms scar tissue in the lungs and eventually you cant absorb oxygen through the scar tissue. Fibreglass is made from silica strands which over time can cause silicosis, which is very similar to asbestosis, except fibreglass is generally considered safer as the strands can be expelled from the body over time, but still cut and cause scar tissue buildup in the lungs. Guess what fine metal particles can do as well.
#1 - protect your lungs.
#2 - properly handled, asbestos is a safe material and is actually still used globally quite a bit.
#3 - OH&S is starting to treat any silica containing compound as a hazardous material and proper ppe must be used when handling due to potential inhalation.
#4 - protect your lungs.

That is all.
 
No, sorry, that is not all.

Fiber glass does not cause silicosis.

And there is just no clinical comparing asbestos and glass fiber.
 
No, sorry, that is not all.

Fiber glass does not cause silicosis.

And there is just no clinical comparing asbestos and glass fiber.

You know what? Youโ€™re right. I went looking for that study, and it was a study from the 70โ€™s that showed lab animals developing mesothelioma. It was shown in later studies not to cause it in humans, and was downgraded to an irritant and possible carcinogen.
 
No, sorry, that is not all.

Fiber glass does not cause silicosis.

And there is just no clinical comparing asbestos and glass fiber.
Depends on who you read. I have a feeling we could go back and forth on this the same as research regarding climate change.

Chiazze, Leonard, Deborah K. Watkins, Cheryl Fryar, and Joseph Kozono. "A case-control study of malignant and non-malignant respiratory disease among employees of a fiberglass manufacturing facility. II. Exposure assessment." Occupational and Environmental Medicine 50, no. 8 (1993): 717-725. - "There were raised ORs for the higher cumulative exposure categories for respirable fibres, asbestos, silica, and asphalt fumes. For both silica and asphalt fumes, ORs were more than double the reference groups for all exposure categories. A limited number of subjects were exposed to fine fibres. The scarcity of cases and controls limits the extent to which analyses for fine fibre may be carried out. Within those limitations, among those who had worked with fine fibre, the unadjusted, unmatched OR for lung cancer was (1.0 (95% CI 0.229-4.373) and for non-malignant respiratory disease, the OR was 1.5 (95% CI 0.336-6.702)"

Enterline, Philip E., and Vivian Henderson. "The health of retired fibrous glass workers." Archives of Environmental Health: An International Journal 30, no. 3 (1975): 113-116. - "
The commonly reported abnormal findings on chest radiographs are low profusion micronodular opacities, hilar enlargement, and pleural thickening. Rare cases of pulmonary fibrosis, acute eosinophilic pneumonia, and sarcoidosis-like pulmonary disease have been described after exposure to fiberglass.
Detailed exposure history is essential to make the diagnosis. Cessation of fiberglass exposure is important in management of these patients. Inhalation fever, reactive airway disease, and chemical pneumonitis also can be the result of exposure to an endotoxin or binder agents."


But then reading through others
Enterline, Philip E., and Vivian Henderson. "The health of retired fibrous glass workers." Archives of Environmental Health: An International Journal 30, no. 3 (1975): 113-116. "This comparison showed no evidence of any unusual health hazards among fibrous glass workers, except a possible excess in chronic bronchitis."


For me, I'll wear my ppe. I suppose I may have gone a little far in stating fiberglass causes silicosis, and instead should have stopped at non malignant and malignant respiratory disease. I do think however it depends on the structure of fibreglass. Silica rich fiberglass, when ground and airborne can be inhaled introducing silica particles into the lungs.
 
Back
Top