Grain Size and Normalizing WITH UPDATED GRAIN SHOTS

Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
3,814
A couple of weeks ago I stared on a project that required forging some O-1, 52100 and W2. I have not done a lot of O1 forging but that part went well. I just forged a bar and ground from that point. Well along the way I noticed a warp in the O-1 Blade and went to straighten it. I put the blade in vise with the 3 point straightening jig, applied SLIGHT pressure and SNAP. The blade broke without even beginning to bend. Well that's life but was not expected at all since this blade had not been hardened. I immediately examined the break and found extremely large grain. I knew at once what I had done, or not done. In all my haste I had forgotten to normalize the bar after final forging.

The first thing I did was fire up the forge and normalize the other 2 blades. But while I had things warmed up I decided to do some testing to see what the effects of normalizing would be on grain size. The following is what I found.

First is a picture of the bar broken as forged before any normalizing.

IMAG0103_zps69c605cf.jpg


Very large grain and as mentioned the O-1 was very brittle. It was taken from 2100f forging temp and just air cooled. No Normalizing at all.

Next is a picture of grain size after first normalizing. Took it to 1550f, soaked for about 5 minutes and let air cool. The blade still snapped with a light blow from a 2lb hammer.

IMAG0105_zps2af2c5ac.jpg


Smaller grain was refined with one heat. It was still brittle though. So I did one more normalizing dropped the temp to 1450f and soaked another 5 minutes then air cooled. This time it took several blows with the hammer and the bar bent before breaking. The fracture zone showed tearing of the steel rather than an even grain as seen on the other 2 photos.

First side shot of the bar bent from the hammer blows.

IMAG0106_zpsd3e148c8.jpg


Next an end shot of the fracture showing the tear.

IMAG0107_zps5c5c0c74.jpg


So what does this show?? For me it reinforces the need for normalizing. It also shows how grain structure can be repaired with proper heat cycles. I had done an earlier test were I quenched a piece of 15N20 in water from 2200f. The grain was incredibly large and the steel broke with slight hand pressure. Though it did not crack it was full of micro fractures. Could not get a good photo it. I did the same normalizing process and I could see the grain size was reduced. But the micro fractures could not be repaired. Normalizing is a process we need to perform IMHO. I usually do but forgot in this instance. Even if you purchase your steel and only do stock removal, I feel it is a good practice to ensure proper prep for final HT. I will probably do some more quantitative testing to see the performance difference of a non normalized blade vs normalized. But that is another day.
 
Last edited:

Stacy E. Apelt - Bladesmith

ilmarinen - MODERATOR
Moderator
Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
33,022
It also shows that all steel is brittle to some degree after heating and cooling. If it has any amount of alloy ingredients, it will air harden somewhat to a lot. O-1 is like that.
 
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
1,320
Thanks for sharing that with us Chuck. And thanks for taking the time and effort to do it! Currently I only make knives via stock removal, but I was told early on to always normalize. After all, it only takes a little while to perform on a tool that should last several lifetimes. Whats a little extra time?!

Look forward to seeing more of your test. Would have been interesting to see the grain in the 01 after maybe 1 or to more cycles.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
397
Thanks for posting this! Great illustration of reducing grain size through normalization cycles.
I've seen some references to losing hardenability with ultra-fine grain. In the last picture, where the grain was at the finest, the steel appears to have not broken as cleanly. With the extra toughness gained here by the fine grain, do you sacrifice some final hardness after HT? I understand this may be a desirable effect, but I'm interested to know.
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
3,814
I only did 2 thermal cycles on this piece of steel. The last picture shows tearing more than the clean fracture of the previous 2. I experienced the ultra fine grain phenominum when I did 6-8 cycles at ever lower temps. I actually reversed the problem by taking it back to 2000f then doing one more normalizing. On short no I do not experience any reduced hardness from simple 2 normalizing cycles. Git to get on a plane. Later.
 
Joined
Oct 20, 2008
Messages
5,545
Good post, Chuck. Thanks for the pics. I've been multiple thermal cycling de rigeur ever since some time-wasting mishaps a couple years ago. I've actually abandoned the 3-point for blade work, as well. (The problem was I'd get frustrated and use it after heat treat...)
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
393
Would 1084 benefit from normalizing as well? I only do stock removal for now. I plan on working w/1084 for quite a while before moving on to more complex steels. Thanks, Don
 
Joined
Aug 1, 2008
Messages
1,762
pretty much every steel out there will benifit from normalizing.

Chuck just for giggles take that same piece of steel heat to 1450-1500 and quench in a slower oil and then do one quick normalize.
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
3,814
Bill, Will do that and post up a pic next time I fire up. I know what the results will be, fine grain for sure.
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
3,814
OK, Did a HT session today and quenched the piece of O1 as per Bill's advice. Here is the heat and quench break before the Normalizing.

DSC_0002_zps8e03e298.jpg


Extremely fine grain. Would be great to temper and run with this one. Note the oil stained larger grain. Apparently it cracked sometime before I began the normalizing tests. I expect I let the bar get a little too hot. This is common with higher alloy steel, work it too hot and it will turn to mush.

Here is a shot after a quick normalizing.

DSC_0006_zps955cc96c.jpg


Still nice super fine grain but you can see more tearing. The piece of material is getting smaller and I could not break it with the hammer. It is tough in the normalized form, partly to do with its size. I had to put it in the press and 3 point it. It took some good pressure to snap it.


Why did I want to show this? I am not trying to preach any specific process. I have seen a lot of questions about what effect do these procedures have on the steel and can you repair over sized grain. Well You can see that normalizing does reduce grain size and the grain can be repaired/returned to a usable form even after minor overheating.

Have fun and try it yourself.
 

jll346

Knife maker
Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
Joined
May 29, 2006
Messages
3,988
Thank you very much for all the photos and info. It really helps me understand things more.
 
Last edited:

Willie71

Warren J. Krywko. Part Time Knifemaker
Joined
Feb 23, 2013
Messages
12,123
Based on what you have experienced with O-1, what would the recommended number of heat cycles be after heat treat and at what temperature? I am new at this. I have seen some reference to normalizing prior to heat treat as well. What is the reason for this and what is recommended? Sorry about the newbie questions. My local steel supply only had O-1. I wanted 1084. I may just save the O-1 for later projects when I am more experienced.
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
3,814
Normalizing is performed prior to HT. This is what I outlined here. The quench in slow oil was purely for grain refinement. The steel in the post quench and normalize heat is not hard enough to be a serviceable blade.


With O-1 tempering will depend on the use of the blade. For small users I temper at 425-450f for 2 hours twice. For heavier users I would temper up at the 475-500f range. Again 2 hours twice. Your results may vary, check hardness and if it is still to hard up the temp 25f and re temper until you get the results you are looking for.
 
Top