I have a couple of Wetterlings, I got these instead of a GB because I can get them for dealer prices. Compared to a GB they are 25% of the price that I would pay here.
Over the weekend I received a model 26 (limbing axe) and spent about 10 hours on it with file and paper to square off and flatten the poll and to polish down to #1200 the head and to sharpen it.
On the Outdoors Magazine forum there is a pretty respected guy (Old Jumbo) that is very knowledgable about axes and hatchets.
In one article he compares a Wetterlings to a GB. They are very very similar in size and weight.
Here are some quotes from the article.
Now, the comment that Cliff has made (and incidently did the author of this article) says that 'With a bit of work' Meaning to just dress up the not so great factory edge. I went the whole hog, including rubbing down the handle and soaking it in Linseed oil. For 25% of the cost and having an axe that I know will cut like the devil is worth the work. It hasnt been modified from the stock shape just 'tuned' so saying that the same work done on a GB would yield the same results is not a foregone conclusion. I would like to see it done though.
Over the weekend I received a model 26 (limbing axe) and spent about 10 hours on it with file and paper to square off and flatten the poll and to polish down to #1200 the head and to sharpen it.
On the Outdoors Magazine forum there is a pretty respected guy (Old Jumbo) that is very knowledgable about axes and hatchets.
In one article he compares a Wetterlings to a GB. They are very very similar in size and weight.
Here are some quotes from the article.
(LHA refers to the Large Hunting Axe from Wetterlings)For the LHA, the sharpening session took 15 minutes, to make the edge symetrically convex and as sharp as the SFA. If one is not ready to sharpen an axe , he should not buy one, that is my view on the question. So yes the SFA comes Sshaper, and it is a nice touch, but it is not important. I also made the poll more symetrical. One day, I may remove the varnish to treat the handle in tung or linseed oil, but really the axe works fine like it is, as you will discover reading by the rest of this article.
(SFA refers to the Small Forest Axe from Gransfor)Cutting a log: The LHA is very efficient in terms of penetration and control. It is easy to penetrate deep in hard wood, cutting big chips, but also the axe does not glance. A wide varieties of angles works very fine. The SFA has a tendancy to glance after 30 degrees, and its precision because of that is less, whether used with one or two hands. It also penetrates less.
Cutting branches The LHA is the big winner, because of its unequaled penetration and precision. This axe makes me think of a Survival golok from Valiant in terms of wood penetration, it just cuts through branches some one and a half time better that the two other axes.
Everything has a price, so the LHA is also the axe that has the most tendancy to stick, but this is also because it penetrates deeper. Nothing bad anyway a litles shaking and it releases, but it does stick more. The thin convex profile of the LHA is certainly very efficient.
Now, the comment that Cliff has made (and incidently did the author of this article) says that 'With a bit of work' Meaning to just dress up the not so great factory edge. I went the whole hog, including rubbing down the handle and soaking it in Linseed oil. For 25% of the cost and having an axe that I know will cut like the devil is worth the work. It hasnt been modified from the stock shape just 'tuned' so saying that the same work done on a GB would yield the same results is not a foregone conclusion. I would like to see it done though.