I've mostly carried little peanut knives like my Case whittler, or an Opinel carbone folder. The biggest knife I've carried is a Morakniv for bushcraft. I've recently begun to desire a big knife, not just in the kitchen but for carry. I live in a rural area, where it is both practical and legal as long as I don't conceal it. So I ordered a few plastic/rubber trainers. I haven't received the subhilt yet, but I was working with the dagger and bowie. Although the trainers don't have the same weight as the steel knives, they do have a balance that is close. I was trying them out with some slashing and stabbing motions, because, well, let's face it, you don't get a Bowie just to baton wood or whittle some feather sticks. Because these knives are big, I realized there can be a lot of leverage from the end of the knife to your grip hand.
Look, if this Bowie was a little longer, it might work better with a two-handed grip. Maybe it's fine for chopping like a machete, but the clip point suggests piercing and stabbing. What I found with the trainer was that the Bowie was hard to handle stabbing anything that had much resistance. The dagger is shorter, has a slimmer grip, and of course it is going to penetrate better. Although it cannot chop or slash with the inertia of the Bowie's big mass, the balance point is just below the index finger so the blade handles much faster and the grip feels more secure without the weight so far forward of the hand. Now I'm sure that either one is vulnerable to disarm attempts, but it seems I'm more likely to self-disarm if I'm too wild with the Bowie. A powerful blow presents a lot of leverage to twist it out of my hand.
I have somewhat big hands with thin fingers. My hand is at least 7.55" long and 4" wide across the knuckles. I think I have fairly good grip strength, but it's something I can train more of. Aesthetically, I'm attracted to the medium-sized Bowies, but the balance on the dagger and I suspect the subhilt as well, feel more natural for everything but chopping.
I'm new to bladeforums, but if you do anything with the big knives besides keeping them in a display case, I'd love to hear what you think.
Look, if this Bowie was a little longer, it might work better with a two-handed grip. Maybe it's fine for chopping like a machete, but the clip point suggests piercing and stabbing. What I found with the trainer was that the Bowie was hard to handle stabbing anything that had much resistance. The dagger is shorter, has a slimmer grip, and of course it is going to penetrate better. Although it cannot chop or slash with the inertia of the Bowie's big mass, the balance point is just below the index finger so the blade handles much faster and the grip feels more secure without the weight so far forward of the hand. Now I'm sure that either one is vulnerable to disarm attempts, but it seems I'm more likely to self-disarm if I'm too wild with the Bowie. A powerful blow presents a lot of leverage to twist it out of my hand.
I have somewhat big hands with thin fingers. My hand is at least 7.55" long and 4" wide across the knuckles. I think I have fairly good grip strength, but it's something I can train more of. Aesthetically, I'm attracted to the medium-sized Bowies, but the balance on the dagger and I suspect the subhilt as well, feel more natural for everything but chopping.
I'm new to bladeforums, but if you do anything with the big knives besides keeping them in a display case, I'd love to hear what you think.