- Joined
- Jun 16, 2003
- Messages
- 20,207
skammer said:Hey Thomas,
How many Mass continental disasters you lived through?
As I thought, your opinion is noted.
Thank you for noting my opinion. Your opinions have value to me if only because they provoke discussion and get some to think through what they need to do and may be forced to do -- in the first instance and in the last extreme.
"Mass continental disasters"? About as many as you have Skammer -- and about as many as are likely in my lifetime and yours combined. But I have lived thorugh eathquakes followed by fires and looting and large riots in two different cities. I just don't see every stranger as a threat and every casualty or relatively "weak" person as someone to be dumped because they don't "contribute."
Group dynamics can break down in even small disasters, I saw fist fights in stores before a hurricaine pitting neighbours against each other.
Absolutely. So? That does not support your lone wolf approach. Group dynamics "break down" frequently. People get in fights - even riot - after their sports teams lose -- or win. One solution is group action, not scattering to the wilderness and leaving the mob in control. (By the way, can we speculate that the folks indiginous to the wilderness may not greet you with total acceptance?)
Don't talk yourself into the group hug mentality because people will do what they need to survive. If it gets bad enough they will come after your stuff.
"Group hug"? Not likely, but a group is typically stronger than the individual if proper leadership is available. You seem all too ready to write off the group and head to the hills.
"If it gets bad enough": history teaches that "if it gets bad enough," the strong may very well sacrifice to save the weak. That conduct is a good survival characteristic because the weakest are the children who insure the survival of the race.
History also teaches that in some cities in mass starvation, order did not break down. Therefore, as matter of human experience, your speculations may not come to pass.
Will we ever see such a situation? Who knows my crystal ball is on the blink. BUt I do prepare for much more than a 3 hour blackout. Millions of people in a small area with little to live on is a not good thing no matter how you work the numbers.
All too true, and your concern about preparation, as such, is a good example to us all. However, some, like HK2001, would prefer to be prepared beyond caring only for themselves and beyond running, even if it should come to that in the end.
In my experience a weeks worth of food and water and odds and ends is more than 90% of the city population has prepared. This fact in itself says something about your own security should TSHTF.
A point you have already made, and a good point. But some disagree with some of the conclusions you draw about responding to the risk.