I am relatively new to the forums and this is my first post. ...I am a diehard lurker though!
The crux of my questions concern the Arete posted here:
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/952463-FiddleBack-Arete-w-Custom-RainWalker-Leather
If one looks at the last picture it seems the handle width is much wider up near the ricasso than in the specs and images Talfuchre posted in his Fiddleback Arete- First Impressions post here .
The reason I ask it two fold. 1st, I am quite interested in the Arete, as I like O-1, Scandi grinds, and blades just shy of 4 inches! The only concern I have is I tend to like a little less width up front for when I change my grip or choke up. Talfuchre, I believe you even mentioned to Dogwood Dan that you preferred less width up front as well in the What would you like in a hiking back packing knife post.
I have few images to go on, so any clarity one can provide on whether the width is now different (design change), or a little artistic license was exhibited by Andy in this Arete's case, or whether I am crazy!
I find the width in the scales up near the ricasso on Dan Koster's Bushcraft (a knife compared side by side in the first impressions post) to be a little to thick and I have sanded them down a bit.
My personal preference would be exactly like the sketch in the first impressions post above (.650) IIRC.
Something in between the Bushcraft Northwest Celilo, located here, and the perceived width in the first photo listed above.
Anyway, I am inclined to purchase this knife even though I prefer a little lighter colored scales, but wanted some input from the experts on this forum.
The pickings on Aretes is rather slim it seems (hint)!
Thanks Andy for a great line of knives!
-Woody
The crux of my questions concern the Arete posted here:
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/952463-FiddleBack-Arete-w-Custom-RainWalker-Leather
If one looks at the last picture it seems the handle width is much wider up near the ricasso than in the specs and images Talfuchre posted in his Fiddleback Arete- First Impressions post here .
The reason I ask it two fold. 1st, I am quite interested in the Arete, as I like O-1, Scandi grinds, and blades just shy of 4 inches! The only concern I have is I tend to like a little less width up front for when I change my grip or choke up. Talfuchre, I believe you even mentioned to Dogwood Dan that you preferred less width up front as well in the What would you like in a hiking back packing knife post.
I have few images to go on, so any clarity one can provide on whether the width is now different (design change), or a little artistic license was exhibited by Andy in this Arete's case, or whether I am crazy!
I find the width in the scales up near the ricasso on Dan Koster's Bushcraft (a knife compared side by side in the first impressions post) to be a little to thick and I have sanded them down a bit.
My personal preference would be exactly like the sketch in the first impressions post above (.650) IIRC.
Something in between the Bushcraft Northwest Celilo, located here, and the perceived width in the first photo listed above.
Anyway, I am inclined to purchase this knife even though I prefer a little lighter colored scales, but wanted some input from the experts on this forum.
The pickings on Aretes is rather slim it seems (hint)!
Thanks Andy for a great line of knives!
-Woody
Last edited: