- Joined
- Sep 22, 2002
- Messages
- 400
I'd know that sig anywhere - you're from SFI!
By "bigger issues" I am referring in particular to the:
lack of an actual kissaki/yokote (it bugs me, may not bug you). All generations.
the general thinning of the blade in later generations - the higher shinogi and decreased cross section concern me - earlier generations were thicker, which I think is a decent strengthening measure on what is essentially a bottom-tier sword. This is only the newer runs.
poor fit for the saya (in general, there are good ones but the ones I've seen all had a bit of "roughness" to them. Applies to all generations.
snapping incidents - you've probably seen the posts on SFI - such fragility shouldn't be the norm, but since they're mass produced the failures of a few have to count against all of them (in my opinion). Frankly, I have no idea which generation's swords were most susceptible.
All of these, in my opinion, are problems that demand more attention than an almost imperceptible twist. Hope this cleared things up!
(Just to defend myself against holding the failures of a few katanas against the entire line: The swords in question are made in relatively large quantities, with as little variation between any two swords as possible. Assuming the steel source is relatively homogeneous, the shaping process is consistent between batches of swords, and heat treatment does not vary, then the problems of one are as likely as not to be the problems of all.)
By "bigger issues" I am referring in particular to the:
lack of an actual kissaki/yokote (it bugs me, may not bug you). All generations.
the general thinning of the blade in later generations - the higher shinogi and decreased cross section concern me - earlier generations were thicker, which I think is a decent strengthening measure on what is essentially a bottom-tier sword. This is only the newer runs.
poor fit for the saya (in general, there are good ones but the ones I've seen all had a bit of "roughness" to them. Applies to all generations.
snapping incidents - you've probably seen the posts on SFI - such fragility shouldn't be the norm, but since they're mass produced the failures of a few have to count against all of them (in my opinion). Frankly, I have no idea which generation's swords were most susceptible.
All of these, in my opinion, are problems that demand more attention than an almost imperceptible twist. Hope this cleared things up!
(Just to defend myself against holding the failures of a few katanas against the entire line: The swords in question are made in relatively large quantities, with as little variation between any two swords as possible. Assuming the steel source is relatively homogeneous, the shaping process is consistent between batches of swords, and heat treatment does not vary, then the problems of one are as likely as not to be the problems of all.)