Happy Days, It's Back

Status
Not open for further replies.
springfieldnovacnoname.jpg


Novak's FBI Model Right???? I remember reading/drooling about it in Handguns or G&A in the 90's!!! Wanted one Sooo Baaaad after seeing the stippling/texturing on the topstrap and gripframe/MSH!!! How does she shoot???? We need a couple more pics of that one please!!! Beautiful Pistol Sir!!!:thumbup:

I ended up with a SA Operator and it too has the now discontinued bar-dot sights with the raised catch on the front edge of the rear sight, videki short trigger, Ed Brown "Wedge" MSH and full Melonite job from Coal Creek Armory. It was a great duty gun when I worked at my last agency (Have to carry "fantastic plastic" now)...
Operator015.jpg


Oh and....

Please put my name down for a DCBB Blk-G10 SAR7!!!! Looks GREAT!!!!!


Stump
 
Originally posted by Jaxx:
Nice SAR 7, Skunker! ...And that pistol ain't bad either...
Looks like Jaxx spotted it first. That SAR7 thingaling is the bomb and the handgun ain't bad, either ! ;)
 
Alright, Skunk. Don't make me break out the Professional Tools.

If I have to mensurate that pic tonight, there'll be heck to pay.:mad:

I did earlier. I roughly measured the handle / blade ratio of a pic of my SAR 6 and got ~1.48. I measured the one in his pic and got a ratio of ~1.43. Factoring in parallax I figured it was about the same as my SAR 6. I calculated that if the handle length was the same as a SAR 6, the SAR 7 would have a ratio of ~1.85. So I thought it was a SAR 6.

I was going to measure the Novak and compare next but then RussMo pointed out the lack of jimping, so I did not bother. The company store shows SAR 6 #13 with jimping. Now there is a slight drop on the spine on this "new" one so it could be that Skunk had his 6 modified but the pattern on the scales also looks different and the grind at the choil and ricasso. So I guess it is not completely unreasonable to assume this is a SAR 7.

Some of the more experienced eyes seemed to have spotted it without all the measuring.
 
handle / blade ratio of a pic of my SAR 6 and got ~1.48. ratio of ~1.43. Factoring in parallax I calculated that if the handle length was the of ~1.85. So I thought it was the Novak and compare next but then RussMo pointed out the lack of jimping, #13 with a slight drop on the spine on this "new" one so it could be that Skunk had his 6 modified but the pattern on the scales also looks at the choil and ricasso. So I guess it is completely unreasonable to assume this is a SAR 7.

Some of the more experienced eyes seemed to have spotted it without all the measuring.
+1




.
 
lol. Some might agree there is no need to assume - the pic is there. As well - I am hold ing my SAR6 LE up to screen and I believe the the pictured knife is not a SAR6 LE - the proportions are out.....oh well.
 
iS A puRe beauty. you said ("+14") 7 + 7? "17 years ago"? lots of 7s....Humm....me likes...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top