I decided to say **** it and get both! 
Because of the great deal I got on the pack, I had an extra couple hundred so I got both. I figure this, life's too short to not buy the stuff you want. Both of these knives will be used hard and I'll be sure to post my impressions. I can't wait to try them.
As far as that review by Cliff Stamp goes, it seems to go against the norm as far as these knives go. I think Cliff probably got a factory defect. Even so it states that he returned the knife and was given a full refund regardless of the abuse. Thats compelling proof that Fehrman stands behind his knives even though that knife was batoned with an axe and chopped into concrete. Personally I would not give a refund or replacement to someone who was intentionally trying to destroy the knife. Thats BS. If someone wanted to test a knife to destruction they should buy it and pay for the chance to do that. Thats like buying a car and purposely crashing it into a brick wall at 90 mph and then expecting the dealership to give you a new one. I wouldn't fault Busse or Fehrman if they didn't cover destruction tests. Don't get me wrong, I think those destruction tests are informative and do show just how much punishment a knife can take. But a tester should be truthful and ask the company for a blade to test or expect to buy one.
Chances are these companies have to raise their prices to cover replacement of purposely destroyed knives. Who suffers for that? Us. A hard use knife should have a great warranty and should be able to be used MUCH harder than your average knife, but intentional destruction is a whole different story.