I just came back from trying a Gerber (Fiskars) Back Paxe on an oak that came down in the wind a few weeks ago. The hatchet is 9" long, weighs 19 oz. according to the Survival Inc. page:
http://www.gerbergear.com/product.php?model=5912
http://www.survivalinc.com/product_view.cfm?product_ID=573&subproduct_ID=919
I just did a little minor limbing, mostly whacking up the springy green branches to pile better for later burning. I could usually whack through a 1" brach with one good backhand swipe at 45 degrees into the grain. 2" branches took a few whacks. I counted blows to get through a 4-1/2" branch, working one-handed but otherwise with axe style: 45 degrees one way, 45 degrees the other and pop the chip out. 75 chops to separation. The annoying thing about this hatchet is that it is so short it wants to slip out of your hand. You really have to whip the thing to do good chopping.
I also have a Fiskars hatchet that is a little longer. It isn't that much heavier but works a whole lot better.
http://www.fiskars.com/US/Garden/Product+Detail?contentId=85474
I guess I had my weights a little off. I was thinking that the small hatchet was lighter than a knife, but that isn't necessarily so. The knife that I have been mentally comparing to is the Becker BK7/BK77 with a 7" blade at 13 oz, 6 oz less than the Back Paxe:
http://www.camillusknives.com/1mainframe.htm?bkt/bk7.shtml~main
http://www.camillusknives.com/1mainframe.htm?bkt/bk77.shtml~main
I don't have a large knife to compare to my hatchets. I might get a BK7 to try though. Trying to compare one person's chopping with one tool to a different person's chopping with another toll is a but tenuous.
One job I did think of where a knife might work a lot better is as a weapon. Against an animal I would suspect a knife is better. I am not sure about with people though. I would think a hatchet would have more psychological effect on an assailant.
Just some thoughts.
Scott
P.S. I went back and tried the 14" hatchet on the same branch: 39 chops to separation.
http://www.gerbergear.com/product.php?model=5912
http://www.survivalinc.com/product_view.cfm?product_ID=573&subproduct_ID=919
I just did a little minor limbing, mostly whacking up the springy green branches to pile better for later burning. I could usually whack through a 1" brach with one good backhand swipe at 45 degrees into the grain. 2" branches took a few whacks. I counted blows to get through a 4-1/2" branch, working one-handed but otherwise with axe style: 45 degrees one way, 45 degrees the other and pop the chip out. 75 chops to separation. The annoying thing about this hatchet is that it is so short it wants to slip out of your hand. You really have to whip the thing to do good chopping.
I also have a Fiskars hatchet that is a little longer. It isn't that much heavier but works a whole lot better.
http://www.fiskars.com/US/Garden/Product+Detail?contentId=85474
I guess I had my weights a little off. I was thinking that the small hatchet was lighter than a knife, but that isn't necessarily so. The knife that I have been mentally comparing to is the Becker BK7/BK77 with a 7" blade at 13 oz, 6 oz less than the Back Paxe:
http://www.camillusknives.com/1mainframe.htm?bkt/bk7.shtml~main
http://www.camillusknives.com/1mainframe.htm?bkt/bk77.shtml~main
I don't have a large knife to compare to my hatchets. I might get a BK7 to try though. Trying to compare one person's chopping with one tool to a different person's chopping with another toll is a but tenuous.
One job I did think of where a knife might work a lot better is as a weapon. Against an animal I would suspect a knife is better. I am not sure about with people though. I would think a hatchet would have more psychological effect on an assailant.
Just some thoughts.
Scott
P.S. I went back and tried the 14" hatchet on the same branch: 39 chops to separation.