- Joined
- Mar 20, 2016
- Messages
- 14,014
Just wondering! Those who state that the NASK / HDFK is smaller than imagined, kindly elaborate as to how? Not a rhetorical question, but the stats were stated as:
OAL = 11.8"
BL = 6.5"
Cutting surface ~ 6" as we knew that there was a choil
Are you perhaps referring to the blade hight of ~ 1.5"?
Perhaps more "svelte" than thought as opposed to small? IMHO no way this knife is slender either, but then again I don't have a comparable BUSSE / Kin to compare it with
but I know that it is not as hefty as a FBF Camp Knife (weighs 1 oz less) and it is slightly shorter by about 0.25" ish? That CK is also taller (1.75"?) so it will cover the HDFK
if placed on top of it. The real test is to which overshadows the other?
91bravo
or
Gusbuster
the floor is all yours Buds 
OAL = 11.8"
BL = 6.5"
Cutting surface ~ 6" as we knew that there was a choil
Are you perhaps referring to the blade hight of ~ 1.5"?
Perhaps more "svelte" than thought as opposed to small? IMHO no way this knife is slender either, but then again I don't have a comparable BUSSE / Kin to compare it with
but I know that it is not as hefty as a FBF Camp Knife (weighs 1 oz less) and it is slightly shorter by about 0.25" ish? That CK is also taller (1.75"?) so it will cover the HDFK
if placed on top of it. The real test is to which overshadows the other?


