UDT:
Thanks for the response. However, I've done a bit of research on cold steel. They're fine for, say, my katana and wakizashi. After all, those are strictly ceremonial and I have them for the same reason that rice is my staple of choice. Cold Steel is not fine for this. In a bit more detail, here are my thoughts:
The Taipan:
300 series stainless ain't what I want to bet my life on. The blade is too long and not thick enough. I want 6 inches and 1/4" thickness ideally, but definitely not more. The handle lacks the proper shape for my purposes and I'm not sure I trust the "shot on" method. The pommel would've almost made the grade, until they put a hole into it.
Recon:
I'm picking this style knife because of how it's most likely to be used. As I'm sure one might've surmised by now, I'm an operator type, not a collector. Held in the left hand, blade out, and tip pointing towards my elbow, the first strike is disabling. The second strike is where the lethality lies, which is a stabbing motion. Hopefully, this explains why I'm looking for a knife with strong piercing properties and a double-edge.
I looked into Gerber MK II's awhile back. From what I could find, they had the same shortcoming, in my eyes, that the original sykes-fairbairn had: the thing came in too many pieces. Blade fits into guard which attaches to handle, and hopefully it won't break on impact. Further, they're collector pieces now. If I'm wrong and they do fit my requirements exactly, I'd still only get one to use if I had no other option. I'm sure there are plenty of people, especially on these forums, who'd love to have an authentic MK II and would be horrified to hear what I'm doing with it.
From what I think, 1/4" is about the best I can do for a trade-off. I'd love a razor sharp edge, but I like a lessened chance of breaking when striking bone even more. Perhaps a contoured edge would help offset it? Please, comment further if you've got the inclination.
OilMan:
It's illegal in my state, but I'm covered under an exemption.
tirod:
Thanks for the suggestion. As I'm doing this severely retroactively, check the second paragraph under my response to reconranger.
Pete:
Thanks for the suggestion. I looked at Boker but just didn't like the multiple pieces and lack of a tang. It's built for deliberate strikes and does it very well. I'm looking for something that's built for fighting and does so very well.
Bastid:
I figured hey, fixed blades, I'm looking for fixed blades, all these blokes are talking about fixed blades... at any rate, thanks for the welcome and the relocation. Fixed blades!
---END---
On a side note, I kept mentioning the finish on the blades for some of my reviews. I had originally intended to put in a little blurb about it at the end, but after I finished editing, I forgot!
At any rate, not on the original requirements list is that I'd prefer a mirror finish. Reason being, it's easier to spot flaws and such, but also for signal purposes as well (calling in medevac, communicating without the radio to allies in line of sight, etc). If I found a knife that had everything I'm looking for but didn't have a mirror finish, it's not going to get disqualified from my selection.