Really?
I have never heard anyone say they do not like a SNG in their handAlso you said you do not "own" either one, so where are you drawing all these absurd conclusions?
I do not have fat stubby fingers and yet I like the SNG. In fact it is some of the best ergos I have ever experienced :thumbup:
I have no dog in the fight either, so Im done here...Strider vs CRK is not what John wanted to discuss in this thread
![]()
Well, I guess you heard it here first, I did not like an SNG in my hand. I'm just one guy and can only speak for myself. I am drawing my absurd conclusions from personal experience with the knife.
I do stick by my opinion that there are a lot of poor design elements in the SNG. It is however a pretty knife, well made and I'm quite sure durable, and if someone likes the knife then they should buy and enjoy it.
I'm glad you enjoy your knife, and I know you're not an oil worker, that's great. But looking at the design, using the knife and even just holding it leads me to the understanding that it's not a knife intended for delicacy of any kind. Again, that's not necessarily a bad thing, just a different design direction.
And I am not intending to make this a Strider vs. CRK issue; what I have tried to convey is that the two companies have two different design philosophies, and since throughout their lines their products share a common design language, it's fair to compare the two languages.
Edit: for what it's worth, the only reason I mentioned that I don't own either knife is to show that I am relatively unbiased. People who own nice things tend to be biased in evaluating those things for one reason or another. I have evaluated both knives and personally decided to go a different direction than either of them; not better or worse, just different.