- Joined
- Aug 13, 2002
- Messages
- 5,703
I have a couple of specific questions but I figured I'd use a little broader title since I am sure more questions will pop-up in my mind and I thought it would be nice to have them all in the same place.
First here is what lead me to those questions. I quickly realized that of course, compared to a fixed blade, you are limited as far as the handle to blade ratio is concerned. And, to me at least, a blade shorter than the handle is not the most aesthetically pleasing look.
So how do we remedy this or at least minimize the visual impact?
The first thing that became obvious is the part that bolsters played in this. I guess they are there primarily to reinforce the pivot area which is where a lot of the stress is applied. But visually they are great at tricking the eye into a more pleasing longer blade/shorter handle ratio. Even more so if the bolster material closely resembles the handle material.
Ok, that works in tricking the eye but we've put the carriage before the horses here. First thing that we need to do is get the blade length as close to the handle length as we can get it. Of course there are folding gizmos that lets you have a blade longer than the handle but that is for another post.
Towards that end here are my 2 questions:
1) The smallest you can make the region in green, the closer you can get to a 1:1 blade/handle ratio but in reality, how small can you really go? I imagine it depends a lot on the size of the blade/knife and intended use but are there any generally accepted rules of thumb? (PS: Disregard blade size, it is only to keep the drawing small)

2) How much of that region can peak above the bolster when the knife is closed? It does look a little better when this is all hidden behind the bolster but I've also seen knives where a good portion protruded. Again, any general rule about this?
Like Don pointed out, I am an over-thinker by nature.
But these days I get very little shop time so thinking is pretty much all I can do. Plus you guys usually have such great advices that may actually help reduce the thinking, something I can't seem to do by myself...without medication that is. 
Any input yo have would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
First here is what lead me to those questions. I quickly realized that of course, compared to a fixed blade, you are limited as far as the handle to blade ratio is concerned. And, to me at least, a blade shorter than the handle is not the most aesthetically pleasing look.
So how do we remedy this or at least minimize the visual impact?
The first thing that became obvious is the part that bolsters played in this. I guess they are there primarily to reinforce the pivot area which is where a lot of the stress is applied. But visually they are great at tricking the eye into a more pleasing longer blade/shorter handle ratio. Even more so if the bolster material closely resembles the handle material.
Ok, that works in tricking the eye but we've put the carriage before the horses here. First thing that we need to do is get the blade length as close to the handle length as we can get it. Of course there are folding gizmos that lets you have a blade longer than the handle but that is for another post.
Towards that end here are my 2 questions:
1) The smallest you can make the region in green, the closer you can get to a 1:1 blade/handle ratio but in reality, how small can you really go? I imagine it depends a lot on the size of the blade/knife and intended use but are there any generally accepted rules of thumb? (PS: Disregard blade size, it is only to keep the drawing small)

2) How much of that region can peak above the bolster when the knife is closed? It does look a little better when this is all hidden behind the bolster but I've also seen knives where a good portion protruded. Again, any general rule about this?
Like Don pointed out, I am an over-thinker by nature.
Any input yo have would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

