i am a fan of the double lug as i am very ambidextrious.
I think that would be the only reason to have them..
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
i am a fan of the double lug as i am very ambidextrious.
As this is freshly back from CR, here are some pic's of my "new and improved" Large Classic with Ironwood. I'll either order them or have them put on every Seb I get in the future, I like them that much.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I like double lugs better, for flexibility in unforeseen future circumstances. However, just to mention a very unlikely but possible concern, the person I recently bought a 1997 BG-42 regular from mentioned that he'd read a post about a blade cracking when the single lug was replaced and a double lug was pressed into the blade. I did some searching and his memory was correct. CRK replaced the blade but it was an S30V replacement. I wouldn't worry about it for a moment with an S30V blade, but if you have a BG-42 blade, which can't be replaced by CRK now, you might pause.
Yup, that did happen to me. For the record, I'm not at all unsatisfied with CRK; they have always been very helpful and professional to me. And I feel very fortunate to just own a Sebenza. However, it is a risk worth considering if you have a rarer BG42 blade.
I like double lugs better, for flexibility in unforeseen future circumstances. However, just to mention a very unlikely but possible concern, the person I recently bought a 1997 BG-42 regular from mentioned that he'd read a post about a blade cracking when the single lug was replaced and a double lug was pressed into the blade. I did some searching and his memory was correct. CRK replaced the blade but it was an S30V replacement. I wouldn't worry about it for a moment with an S30V blade, but if you have a BG-42 blade, which can't be replaced by CRK now, you might pause.
This is why I love this forum - you learn something everyday. Thanks to JNewell and AMRaider for sharing. I never thought of this scenario, but it is seems very valid. As much as I love double lugs, this will definitely make me think more critically about adding them to earlier models.
I like double lugs better, for flexibility in unforeseen future circumstances. However, just to mention a very unlikely but possible concern, the person I recently bought a 1997 BG-42 regular from mentioned that he'd read a post about a blade cracking when the single lug was replaced and a double lug was pressed into the blade. I did some searching and his memory was correct. CRK replaced the blade but it was an S30V replacement. I wouldn't worry about it for a moment with an S30V blade, but if you have a BG-42 blade, which can't be replaced by CRK now, you might pause.
Hmmm, was it implied that the cracking was due to BG-42 being less robust than S30V? My guess is that it had nothing to do with going from single to double thumb studs in BG-42, that that particular blade had a material defect, and that if it would have been single thumbstud replaced with another single thumb stud, it may have been the same outcome. Of course, this is all just conjecture on my part -- I know nothing about that particular case . . .
Hmmm, was it implied that the cracking was due to BG-42 being less robust than S30V? My guess is that it had nothing to do with going from single to double thumb studs in BG-42, that that particular blade had a material defect, and that if it would have been single thumbstud replaced with another single thumb stud, it may have been the same outcome. Of course, this is all just conjecture on my part -- I know nothing about that particular case . . .