- Joined
- Feb 23, 1999
- Messages
- 4,855
I really get a kick when I see some top-notch western bladesmiths playing with the khukuri design. It makes me think of how much influence HI and the kamis have had in bringing appreciation of the khukuri to the west. A few decades ago it was not unusual for people to describe khukuris as trash knives. You dont hear that much anymore, due in large part to the exposure of knowledgeable westerners to high-quality Nepalese khukuris.
There is an asymmetry between the untouchable blacksmiths of Nepal and the relatively wealthy bladesmiths of the west. We westerners have easy access to the internet, bladeshows, forums, etc., and we can draw inspiration from the multitude of designs we are exposed to. How many western bladesmiths can say they were not influenced at all by the design (for instance) of the Randall #1.
The kamis do not have this wide access to classic designs. They draw their inspiration from things they know in their own culture, but are limited in what they see from outside.
The last time I went to Nepal I took over some classic blades. A Randall #1 I picked up a couple of decades ago in the Randall shop in Florida, a Blackjack Trailguide from the Effingham days, and a knock-off of a Grohmann #1. Each is a classic design that has been influential on our western traditions. The kamis have looked them over, and drawn some inspiration from them to come up with their own interpretations, handforged in 5160 spring steel.
I am going to start some passaround threads so we can get some exposure to these efforts. Previous interpretations of western designs from the kamis have drawn comments and discussion of questions like:
Are we corrupting a pure, unsullied tradition by exposing the kamis to western designs?
Is it ethical for Nepalese kamis to draw inspiration from a design created in the west?
Are we misdirecting talent that could be better utilized creating khukuris from their own tradition?
Etc
I ask the help of the forumites to gently direct discussion of those and similar discussions to this thread, where the concepts can be explored without cluttering up the passaround threads.
Stay tuned for the passaround threads.
There is an asymmetry between the untouchable blacksmiths of Nepal and the relatively wealthy bladesmiths of the west. We westerners have easy access to the internet, bladeshows, forums, etc., and we can draw inspiration from the multitude of designs we are exposed to. How many western bladesmiths can say they were not influenced at all by the design (for instance) of the Randall #1.
The kamis do not have this wide access to classic designs. They draw their inspiration from things they know in their own culture, but are limited in what they see from outside.
The last time I went to Nepal I took over some classic blades. A Randall #1 I picked up a couple of decades ago in the Randall shop in Florida, a Blackjack Trailguide from the Effingham days, and a knock-off of a Grohmann #1. Each is a classic design that has been influential on our western traditions. The kamis have looked them over, and drawn some inspiration from them to come up with their own interpretations, handforged in 5160 spring steel.
I am going to start some passaround threads so we can get some exposure to these efforts. Previous interpretations of western designs from the kamis have drawn comments and discussion of questions like:
Are we corrupting a pure, unsullied tradition by exposing the kamis to western designs?
Is it ethical for Nepalese kamis to draw inspiration from a design created in the west?
Are we misdirecting talent that could be better utilized creating khukuris from their own tradition?
Etc
I ask the help of the forumites to gently direct discussion of those and similar discussions to this thread, where the concepts can be explored without cluttering up the passaround threads.
Stay tuned for the passaround threads.