- Joined
- May 19, 2005
- Messages
- 12,709
So I've got a conundrum. I'll be doing a week-long hike in the Sierra Nevada next month. At age 49, I know better than to just get up from my keyboard, strap on a pack, and go wandering around at 8,000 feet and higher. To this end, I've engaged in a fairly varied fitness routine. Mind you, I'm not trying to get a hard body, or set any land speed records. But I would like to be comfortable enough to enjoy my stroll in the mountains.
Here's my problem: my hiking partner is 10 years older than me, and in worse shape. I don't see him very often, but from emails I had thought he was working out to at least the same degree as me. But we went on a hike together last weekend where I quickly realized that my assumptions were false. The guy just isn't doing anything, and it shows.
Now, do I just go with the flow and let him be miserable next month (thereby, possibly, causing our hike to be cut short), or do I nag him about getting into some kind of shape? On the one hand, I'm kind of worried that he might hurt himself. On the other, I REALLY don't feel like being a den mother.
Things like this is why I usually, instinctively, want to hike solo.
Your thoughts?
Here's my problem: my hiking partner is 10 years older than me, and in worse shape. I don't see him very often, but from emails I had thought he was working out to at least the same degree as me. But we went on a hike together last weekend where I quickly realized that my assumptions were false. The guy just isn't doing anything, and it shows.
Now, do I just go with the flow and let him be miserable next month (thereby, possibly, causing our hike to be cut short), or do I nag him about getting into some kind of shape? On the one hand, I'm kind of worried that he might hurt himself. On the other, I REALLY don't feel like being a den mother.
Things like this is why I usually, instinctively, want to hike solo.
Your thoughts?