The same could be said of the Seb compared to a Spyderco. Few people push their folders to the limit, so why bother?No offense, but I have yet to see an xm18 be used so hard that these differences would actually mean anything. Ive been on these forums a long time and have never seen a pic of a hard used xm18. Maybe they exist, but they are few and far between. The irony of hard use knives is that they cot so much that people are afraid to use them hard
.
I think I've been pretty clear that a lesser knife will cover the bases. (I suggested Spydercos to the OP). I've also been clear that if you really need a tough folder, the XM is top dawg right now, and, maybe worth a bit of markup if you need a knife like this. If you don't, save your money.
In addition to being a stronger folder than a Seb, the ergonomics are much more in line with what Spyderco and Strider produce. I prefer this.
Usually people post pics of their new knives, not their old ones. In fact, few people bother to take any more pics once their knife is used. I can post pics of new knives that I don't even own anymore.
I do use my outdoor/work folders hard. I bought an Umnumzann and within two months I had given the scotchbrite treatment to the handles because they were so scratched up and dinged. My Strider Sng had marks all over the blade within months of its purchase.
Now, having used CRK's, Striders and the XM, I can tell you that the XM is much more confidence inspiring in it's construction. I torque and pry much more with it than I ever have dared with any other knife. The handle is a lot more comfy than CRK's and Striders too. Overall, it's just a better knife than either.
I have some pretty knives. They get pressed into EDC hard service in things like letter opening, thread cutting, etc. But I sure wouldn't buy a heavy duty folder for show and EDC.
Hows that Yuna break'in in anyway?