- Joined
- Jan 21, 2010
- Messages
- 3,311
There was a book recommended to me a while back called "On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society" by former Ranger and paratrooper, Lt. Col. Dave Grossman . It talks about the psychological impact of taking a human life and many of the common misconceptions. Basically killing with a firearm it is easier to distance yourself from the act. The closer the target the harder this becomes. At close quarter range (knife range) disassociating becomes impossible, to the person committing the act and others who witness it or the results there of. While killing an animal has significantly less emotional impact, we can’t help but feel empathy to some degree. Even though killing the hog with the knife was quicker and maybe in the end less painful, it’s still viewed as “worse” than a bloodless gunshot wound. Even though slowly dying may have caused more pain and suffering.
I understand why l2lku2 was so upset by the photo and story, seems to me though that the hog was killed within seconds no matter how you look at it.
I understand why l2lku2 was so upset by the photo and story, seems to me though that the hog was killed within seconds no matter how you look at it.