powernoodle
Power Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2004
- Messages
- 11,974
Now I want an EX-03. Peer pressure is great.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Now I want an EX-03. Peer pressure is great.
Here some pics of my Hogue EX-03 with 3.5 inch blade:
The handle is not made from fiberglass reinforced nylon but from fiberglass reinforced PPS, a material that is both stronger & stiffer than FRN.
It's also injection molded in one piece, so no scales that are held together with screws.
This is what Allen Elishewitz says about it:
"The EX-03 is super cool, it is similar to the EX-01 but very different.
It's an injection molded version of the 01, with a one piece handle with bolster plates that are actually molded into the handle.
The balance is more like a G-mascus EX, and the handle material is pretty cool: it feels like aluminum and when you tap it on a table it sounds like glass.
It comes only in black and brown, it has a skull crusher on the back, and all the hardware is identical to the 01.
BTW we broke one at 175 pounds which translates to 612 pounds of linear inch, which means you have to apply 612 pounds of cutting force when holding onto the handle for it to break.
What was interesting was that the lock, bolster plate and blade were all intact."
I can not think of a single reason to get a plastic handle version
sounds lime you're complaining just to complain. If you want the better f&f go with the more expensive model.Keep in mind, you lose a LOT for the price savings: (I don't have any personal experience with the EX-03, so take what I say with a grain of salt)
First, based on what I have seen, the Ex-03 has a worse heat-treat. It is hardened past acceptable working hardness and actually snapped in one hard-use test
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6k6rK4MdGQw (video has english subtitles)
Before it snapped, the Ex-03 also chipped, while the Ex-01 seemed to keep its edge in better condition (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P67pCOCSyQA)
Second, the button lock cylinder seems to be made of a far softer material that seems to deform under stress. (Allan Elishewitz himself tested to lock of the EX-01 and It performed beautifully, while testing of the EX-03 showed deformation on the lock cylinder itself as well as a failure of the safety)
Finally, the molded handle on the 03 is both thinner and lighter, throwing off the balance and ergos of the original 01 design.
I've also heard that the fit and finish on the hardware is significantly worse, though I can't confirm that.
Based on lurking around forums and briefly handling both, I get the impression that the cost savings simply aren't worth it.