Originally posted by ddean
Actually, she does thyroid scans on her patients.
Her machine is set up for that depth & tissue,
but can be set up for other uses.
If the ultrasound machine had a selective depth function which would measure the tissue's thickness to the technician, then the data gleaned from the scan would be useful, albeit not very user friendly. Some U.S. machines cannot be used over metallic objects, and would pose a definite caveat. For just a few spot checks, I think it would work... Depends on the machine...
Finely cut cross sections would obviously evince the thickness, and at a myriad of different points. If the sectioning were carried out as one would carve luncheon meat on a slicing machine, the pieces could be stacked like coins, and give tremendous amounts of useful data. An eye loupe could scrutinize even further... It would be one heck of a conversation piece for a HIKV, and can show newcombers like myself, just how the handle is made. [On a side note, it would be interesting to see how the wood sleeve is dressed on the tang, and then how the horn is prepared to dress this wood sleeve] Hint, hint!
I previously said that the x-ray would not penetrate.:footinmou That would be no problem whatsoever; (500MA wouldn't begin to tickle the steel). The problem is that the steel would show up white, much like bone does when you view an x-ray of a broken bone. A typical x-ray machine would not give you the differentiation you need on such a small object; the stratification of the various media would not come out clearly at all, and you couldn't measure anything accurately. It wouldn't be like placing the back of your hand in front of your eyes, and clearly seeing sharp delineations formed by the fingers. The images that x-rays yield are already imprecise to begin with; if you were to measure the widths of the various different media on the x-ray film, you'd most assuredly go back to plan 1, and just have the handle cross sectioned. Industrial x-ray diagnostics might be able to winnow something useful...
An M.R.I. scan would probably work, but the precise measurements of the various thicknesses of the media would again, be distorted when the M.R.I. films are scrutinized. Besides, if you were using an older M.R.I. machine, you'd have to contend with the claustrophobic factor inherent with many patients.
