Chiro75 said (of the Arcrescia and Scaetha):
The only difference I can see between the two is the finish and maybe a slightly different handle shape.
Actually, the biggest difference between those two is the blade shape. The Scaetha is sort of a Wharncliffe blade while the Arcrescia has the same blade shape as the Kerver, Seraph or Stygia. The Taka (new) appears to have a good deal more belly than any of the others.
Nobody who speaks from experience has so far had any complaints about grip security, but, personally, I have some misgivings about just what any of them would feel like in my hand. The blade shapes and blade to handle relationships are just very different from the usual sort of knives that I see or handle every day, so I just find it difficult to extrapolate. I find, for example, that I don't much like the style of paring knife where the blade looks like a smaller version of a chef's knife, preferring the type where the blade edge lines up more closely with the lower side of the handle. On this basis I have my doubts about any of the Perkins knives as shapes that
I would feel comfortable with as general utility knives. I could easily be wrong and find that I would love them, but I'm not confident of that without handling them. OTOH, if
you tend to prefer the chef's knife shape in a paring knife (or like the Boye Basics), you might feel much more confident of liking the feel of Sean's knives. Certainly nobody I've heard of has had anything at all bad to say about the quality of Sean's knives. I would have no fears on that score, but only on how it would feel in my own hand.
------------------
Paul Neubauer
prn@bsu.edu